revolution saint

Nah, he isn't that bad and would be better than a few I've seen mentioned. Wouldn't be an exciting appointment but this search must be one of the more dispiriting ones we've had and I'm struggling to find anyone realistic that stands out. Fact that we've had more managers than wins over the last 18 months or so suggests changing the manager isn't going to make that much of a difference whoever we appoint.

I'd have Ross Stewart as manager. Lets be honest, it's unlikely whoever the new manager is they'll be around more than a few months so we may as well pick Ross and then, when it comes to getting rid of him, he can go back to (hopefully) playing.

Be worth it just to sort the dressing room out.

Good post and I'm in the same camp. I wouldn't be gutted if Still went but I'm not sure changing him is going to make that much difference either.

Always quite liked Alfie House - seems a decent lad and generally quite fair on TSP.

No one ever does (apart from GM who's a couple of cans short of a six pack).

While I can feel a bit sorry for Still in regards to Stewart getting injured it's worth remembering he took ages before giving him a go. You can't really talk about what a huge loss he is when you make a decision to leave him out and use him as striker of last resort (appreciate Downs now has the title sewn up).

You're more than welcome. Always happy to help. I just thought it worth pointing out that Charlie Kirk denied the result of a legitimate democratic election without any evidence whatsoever. That would make him either stupid, or a shill who based his opinions not on fact but on whatever would benefit him at that particular time. The girl on TikTok probably at least believes what she's saying.

One denied the result of a legitimate democratic election, and the other didn't?

So there’s no free demo available for fm 26 yet.

There's no free demo as far as I can see.

Not all crosses are the same though and Fellows has shown enough variation previously. He can play it in the air, along the ground, cut back to the penalty spot for a midfield runner or a dink to the back post. If he’s doing that and we’re not scoring then you can’t blame him - that’s a team issue.

Can see where you’re coming from but if he’s supplying decent crosses into the box and we can’t find a way to score from them then I think that says more about the rest of the team than it does Fellows.

Yeah, my constituency, New Forest East, is true blue all the way so frankly it really didn't matter whether I voted tactically or not because the Tories would generally get close or above 50% of the electorate anyway. I can see that changing though with a surge for reform and a collapse of the Tory vote which (hopefully) might actually leave a door open for either Labour or Lib Dems but equally it could leave me in the unenviable position of having the two main contenders being Reform and the Tories. If push comes to shove I could vote Tory but certainly not a decision I would particularly relish.

Here's an interesting conundrum for lib dem, green and labour supporters - would you consider voting tactically and voting Tory to stop a reform government? I've voted tactically before and voted both lib dem and labour - both have felt like easy choices and didn't involve much soul searching. Not sure I'd be able to say the same about voting Tory tactically though.