trousers
-
Posts
60943 -
Joined
-
Last visited
1 Follower
trousers's Achievements
-
Harsh
-
For a man's sport? Seems over representative to me...
-
I just read back though the match thread for the Utd game to refresh my memory on the refereeing decisions and, yep, the whole thread is peppered with reactions to 'suspect' decisions. The goal we were denied when 'only' 4 nil down was particularly dodgy IMO...
-
Looks more like Harry Enfield to me... 🙂
-
Cheers Dave - appreciate you going to the trouble of answering my somewhat intrusive question! I wouldn't call my post tally "impressive" as most of it is meaningless twaddle! (With the odd nugget of genius secreted discretely here and there, I'll grant you that... ) Keep posting sir!
-
CHDAJFU...? #banter
-
Fair point 👍🏻
-
I guess the difference between Stephens' and Schlotterbeck's cock ups is the context... When Stephens messes up, it's often against the backdrop of an overall sub-par performance, whereas Schlotterbeck's misdemeanors were in stark contrast to the other 99% of his game... In other words, people tend to forgive the odd mistake here and there if they're more the exception than the rule...
-
12 appearances, 3 starts, 9 off the bench, no goals....
-
Funny you should say that.... I'm still trying to deduce which one is @Matthew Le God
-
Several fair points there sir 👍🏻
-
Dave... I think I've asked this before, so apologies for not remembering the answer... Is there a particular reason why you break up your sentences with carriage returns and blank lines? It's just that it jars a tad when reading your posts, and i often find myself skipping over them as a result, which is a shame given I enjoy your content. Bit of a first world gripe, admittedly, but just my curiosity getting the better of me (for once ) 🙂
-
Given "cover for Azaz" was the one and only definitive 'new signing' target stated by Dragan (as per his interviews in June), are we saying that he/the club failed to achieve that sole aim?
-
So, who's on Saintsweb then...? #decisionsdecisions
