trousers

Blimey... You know a Prime Minister's in trouble when they get rattled by the likes of Ed Davey... #PMQs

Inclined to agree, but surely there has to be some kind of dependency on appearances built into the contract...?

I'm in two minds (just for a change....!) As we don't have a midweek match next week, there's an argument for giving our first choice starting 11 another opportunity to gel even further, and keep the momentum building. But there's also a case for giving those players a week off to relax and rejuventate. Swings and roundabouts.

Yep, agree. If Archer is seriously our only senior striker fit enough to start at the moment, then start he must. Can only hope that not being dropped will be a confidence booster for him... #benefitofthedoubt

Human beings in reacting to what they're seeing at the time shocker! Always good to see the hindsight brigade out in full force... (I must have missed your half time post informing us everything was fine and not to worry as we'd obviously turn things around) (No offence Nick, I love you really... Mwah 😘)

Eckert / Frank Joint-Manager dream team...? 😁

Indeed, and before you know it we'll have saddos logging onto internet forums and making loads of posts during a game... Just watch the match FFS...!

Indeed...

Implore his bosses to provide him with strikers whose natural state isn't 'unfit' so we don't get into this ridiculous situation in the first place...?

Touch Wood? Is that the station just before Cockfosters?

As always, I think there are valid opinions on both sides of this coin. Leaving a player on too long when they are obviously struggling can dent a player's confidence as much as being hooked too soon. On reflection, I'm still leaning towards wanting to see things changed during the first half, but I appreciate the alternative point of view at the same time 👍🏻