trousers

Extended highlights...

Do the laws say he has to be "obstructing" his view to be deemed offside, or does being a distraction count too? (I've no idea, just curious)

Thinking out loud.... I wonder how much of a backlash would there be if the FA were relatively lenient with Eckert and how much will they be taking that into account in their deliberations, either consciously or sub-conciously? "We don't want to dish out a disproportionate punishment but it has to be punitive enough to satisfy everyone else" (?) (Under scrutiny, they'd obviously claim that the wider footballing community reaction doesn't / shouldn't influence their desision, but they would say that, wouldn't they...)

Agreed, but there's one major flaw in your train of thought... You appear to be assuming the FA will deal with this rationally and logically. I admire your optimism...

Pass. No idea.

Quite... Equally, the FA also didn't have a spying rule when Bielsa admitted to doing much more than Tonda... (FFS Trousers... You know the forum thought police frown upon any comparison with the Bielsa case, so why bring it up you f***ing plum?)

Also, given we're performing as well post-'spygate' as we were before it came to light, does this lay to rest the accusation that we significantly gained, if at all, from the 'spying'...?

Yep, it's pretty much inevitable that the FA will hand out a completely disproportionate punishment. I'm expecting a 6 month ban from all footballing activities* (*Anyone know if such a ban would cover 'someone' from the club meeting up with Tonda down the pub for a 'social chit chat' every now and then, coincidentally in the run up to our matches...? )

Not one of our top 11 players so I couldn't be arsed to monitor his performance...

Easy

Never any doubt

FFS Such a soft goal

Have they got anyone that cost £9m on their bench though...?

LAAAAAAARRRRRRINNNN