Jump to content

trousers

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    61,184
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

trousers's Achievements

  1. At least we wouldn't have to travel to shit holes such as Middlesbrough...
  2. You're not allowed to compare it with Bielsa FFS! How many more times...?
  3. Clutching at straws but what are the chances of the club having a hitherto unpublished 'dosier' of other clubs that have done the same thing, which they've been keeping up their sleeve if they felt a nuclear reaction was ever warranted? After all, the club did state in it's original response to the EFL verdict that they were 'offering to help set up a commission to investigate the wider implications' (or words to that effect)... Why would they have said that if they had zero evidence of anyone else doing it, anecdotal or otherwise...?
  4. Bat shit crazy (not you, a sanction that disproportionate)
  5. Me too.... Hope there isn't a pile on...
  6. As long as I can sit on it...
  7. Is there a limit on the number of analogies we're allowed to post on this thread per day? 🙂
  8. Nice goal...
  9. As I say, it *could* be a coincidence that he was requesting the info before it breached the rules...
  10. Echo this. Almost all my circle of friends (yes, I have a few... ) concur about the proportionality of the sanctions (both what the EFL dished out and what the FA might be about to). It's almost as if social media is peppered with a vocal minority of numbnuts...
  11. I reckon they should turn their attention to the disciplinary record of Neil Harris...
  12. I suppose, in theory, both could be true... i.e. he asked them to do it earlier in the week because he wanted to know as in advance as possible, not because he knew it would be against the rules if he requested it later in the week...?
  13. http://www.fawanews.sc/Japan vs Uruguay.html
  14. Goooooaaaallll
×
×
  • Create New...