trousers

I'd have had him back as a '70 min sub' option... But obviously "past it" and "too injury prone" according to the Saintsweb intelligentsia...

Yes, as long as you put a passive-agressive ", right?" at the end of every question...

Quick 'out of curiosity' question to anyone ITK... If the club wanted to, would they be at liberty to 'go public' on how the hearing went on Thursday, even if only releasing a holding statement that probably doesn't tell us much, or are they under an embargo not to say a single word, not even a one-liner holding statement, until the FA say we can? I know the response to my curiosity on here will be: "What's the point of saying anything at all if they can't actually tell us any details" but that's not my point. I'm just curious as to what they are at liberty to say, even if there's "no point" in doing so. Thank you kindly fellow Saintswebbers

Does this mean Lord Pannick is going to be too busy to be involved in our appeal...?

Meanwhile...

Attention seekers? On an internet football forum? Acting strange? Nah... That's normal mate...

I'm starting to get worried now... Given our spying is the 'worst rule breach in the history of the game', he's bound to get a more punitive sanction than this fella...

Tweaked it for you...

Bielsa would be the most amusing IMO (zero chance of that happening, I know) but agree Edwards would have a high chortle rating 👍🏻

I'm Mrs Eckert!

Playing golf at Haggs Castle later?

Would you prefer responses with or without hindsight...?

At least we wouldn't have to travel to shit holes such as Middlesbrough...