Gingeletiss

Agreed..........there are some right bl**dy drama Queens on here.

What is the point of 'members only rules', if the body that oversees those rules, chooses to ignore them when a new member wishes to join the club. How then is the new member expected to see where the line is drawn....this is about the rules being broken, not by Saints, but by the body that oversees the rules. Nothing to do with law. IMHO of course

Reading his dailys...fills me with confidence Reading yours and others panic posts.......does not fill me with confidence.

You forgot the 'IMO'.......because there are many who support Saints, who will disagree with the way you have expressed YOUR views. IMO of course

When placed together, you still only have 100% of an amount, take away half of that, and you could argue you only have 50% left:confused:

Arggggghhhh!!!!!!!:mad:....I know that was tongue in cheek, but you can't more than 100% of anything....It makes me so mad:mad:

I agree........but the money issue is for the new (I hope) owners, and possibly the police. As to being murky........LOL.....that's one word;). My point is the FL's own rules, if we haven't broken them, why should we be punished. We don't write them, they do, if there is a loophole that can be exploited, then we should go for it. As would any other club in the country, and I include the Tyro in that!!!

This is really starting to wind me up now.........WHY should we accept it. As pointed out by another poster, the rules state that you are given a 10 point penalty for trying to gain an advantage by going into administration. We, as a club did not go into administration, and RL (even though I hate the man) tried everything to stop administration happening.....cripes, we couldn't of cut costs any further, and that cost us our place in the Championship.........so pray tell, what advantage Have we sought to gain???

100% certain......I have faith in TL.

Why the fer-k is everyone saying we deserve it morally:mad:. We the fans, the team, the workforce, the city....we deserve no such thing. Stewpert/Wilde etc, deserve the caning. So IMHO, if we can get out of it, we should.

Thank you good sir.....unlike some on here, I have the utmost confidence in you and your team. Should you fail, then it won't be for the lack of trying.

50%...but a good source.....nothing is certain in life, but this person knows things. This is not given as a fact, but as an opinion. Time will tell. Personally, I like it to be Richard Branson.....but hey ho!!

Spot on post........hate the man, but agree with you on the above.

That is my take on it....this is not about -10 this is about a bigger deduction of points for not having a CVA.

Try this.........London property tycoon. worth about 150 Million. Not rich, not poor either.

After Christmas ie 1st Jan........Singapore airlines £350 return.

Try this....fact...Pinnacle haven't bought SLH, they have bought SFC, now join the dots.

Christ...I wish some of you guys would take in what the actual problem is ffs. If it is, as laid out by some on here, and confirmed by TL and MF, then no-one in their right mind will be buying us under the terms that the FL are proposing.............Simple folks

A london property tycoon worth 150 million........watch this space;)

Now then.......who's a clever boy. Anyone with big balls.....I see a lady in the Echo has taken on the local Health Authority re Fluoride, all done with legal aid. Anyone!!!!!!.......feeling brave.

Frank......we've always been small, it's only in some fans eye's that we've been big. Make no mistake, we punched well above our weight for a number of years. IMHO of course

But, the club ie SFC, never went into administration........this is the whole point, so it stands to reason, that we should not lose/have lost our Golden share!!!

Frank........yet again, either I've missed your point, or you have missed mine. All the above is true, but why should the few, who boycotted the club, be held to blame. We did not get the club into debt, no more so, than those who attended last season . The blame can only be atributed to those in charge, and in the main, this was Stewpert......true or not true??

Letiss wore 7

Frank...that's where I disagree. I don't think that was the biggest factor. IMO, the biggest factor, was Wilde inviting Stewpert back for a second go at our destruction, and he succeded this time. Don't blame the fans, the blame falls squarely on the shoulders of the Chairman, and in great part Wilde.