Faz

No no no, feel free to carry on as you are. I don’t understand why anyone would, but please do carry on.

The thing is mate, they’re not your rumours are they? If you just posted xyz journo has linked us with abc footballer, you'd get no stick at all. But no, you have to do the let’s pretend I’m ITK nonsense.

He’s left. Official. https://www.southamptonfc.com/news/2019-08-06/southampton-football-club-statement-danny-rohl

It’s Josip. There is an unverified instagram account following Saints, and an unverified twitter account not, so far as I can see.

If it’s in the public domain, just name him instead of all this BS

In fairness, he does, as he said, have a 100% record.

They can have the clause, but the loan fee goes up to £20m.

Easy commute

They guy only made 2 PL appearances last year, is 33 and is costing them £75kpw plus I’m guessing a significant signing on fee and agents fees. It’s actually a huge gamble by Palace IMO.

Really interested to see how we get on with it. https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/11777969/var-in-the-premier-league-the-ultimate-qa

Have we tried making his life hell?

Easy commute

Welcome and good luck.

They aren't half stretching that £45m budget.

IMO, allowing a player to take more than one penalty in the same game is a recipe for disaster (unless they are MLT or SRL). Rarely works out.

Well, that’s ruined my morning. Damn.

Yes, but it impacts on the club if the owner is raiding club funds to service his borrowing, or if he starts to load his personal debt on to the club. He has not, so far, done either so far as I can see from the filed accounts. Th only thing he is “guilty” of is not investing more of his personal wealth to allow the club to spend more on transfers/wages.

The finance company will be furious

True. Even RH recognised that at the fans forum indicating he would settle for somewhere between 9th and 14th. TBH, after the last two seasons, and at this stage of rebuilding, I’d very happily settle for 14th.

Unless you have evidence that he is unable to, or that if he isn’t he would chose to do so, it isn’t germane to the clubs finances. In any event, the club was already operating under the same financial stricture before Gao, so the basis of your original argument is, I’m afraid, unsound.

Filed Accounts at Companies House

Pardon me for having a life.

I think you’re perfectly capable of being a sophist. The cash flow facility has been in place since our return to the PL in one form or another. The owners debt is only germane if it impacts upon the finances of the club, which it so far has not.

We still are debt free. HTH.

Riiiight. Replace our player of the season with a flipertyjibbert.