Johnny Bognor

Egg Fried R-isis

Stuck together with superglue

Andrew Neil's rant... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oONoFFK5H0k

What a complete and utter shambles Lefties, for the sake of democracy, please sort your **** out

If we are at war with ISIS, then surely they should be chucked in a POW camp.

They are amongst us.... http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/news/local/brothers-from-portsmouth-are-jailed-for-plotting-terrorist-acts-1-7073197 I think 6 years for aiding and abetting ISIS is a disgrace. They could be back out on our streets in 3

Are we talking about Corbyn ("shoot to kill") or Ken ("Insult people with mental health issues")?

True, it may be the case that "they" are already here. However they need weapons, ammunition and explosives and for this reason alone, border controls need to be tightened. Wasn't a chap linked to the Paris attacks stopped with a car full of automatic weapons and explosives?

****ing disgusting. This sexist prejudice mob are no better than the people they pupport to oppose. RIP Labour 1900-2015

My understanding is that the moronites / corbynies have changed the rule where you need 30 MP's to back you in a leadership election, whereby the incumbent is automatically placed on the ballot. This removes the ability of MP's to get rid of him. He will lead the party until the wider party votes otherwise. Quite a sneaky move for someone who is so principled that he would change the rules that got him elected to ensure he stays in power. Perhaps he is not such a ****wit afterall

i disagree. They only need to pretend to be Man U, Liverpool or Chelsea and they'll have no problems getting a seat in the home end

LOL http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/Jeremy_Corbyn/12000003/Jeremy-Corbyn-savaged-by-Labour-MPs-over-shoot-to-kill-opposition.html

I'll raise you... http://newsthump.com/2015/11/17/terrorists-should-be-made-to-sit-on-naughty-step-until-theyre-sorry-insists-corbyn/

I read that one of the bombers seats was next to the players tunnel. Can you imagine the shock of that happening live on TV?

FYI... http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/14036276.St_Mary_s_security_to_be_tightened_after_Paris_attacks/?ref=mr&lp=4

I think the point being made is that although there is a minority, it is a SIGNIFICANT minority. If 90% of people were declared free of AIDs, don't you think that most people would be worried by the fact that 1 in 10 were carriers and the sale of johnnies would shoot through the roof???

I don't think any mainstream politician would agree with a general shoot to kill policy. The previous question related specifically to the attacks in Paris, regarding more police on the streets. The follow up question was about shoot-to-kill. It was obvious that the question wasn't about STK in general, but specific to an attack. The correct answer would have been that in principle he doesn't agree with STK, but under certain circumstances, like a terrorist attack, then he would have to consider giving the order if necessary. He is not prepared to do so. It's easy to sit on your principles on the back benches, but as PM, you sometimes have to make decisions that go against your principles for the greater good. It's called leadership. As for his principles, he has sat down with Hamas, Hezbollah and the IRA to negotiate settlements. Why isn't he on the next flight to Syria, being a man of principle? Ah, he knows damn well they'll cut his head off and mail it back 1st class. So much for principles, eh???

I put this on the Paris thread, but might be more relevant here... Mr Corbyn was asked by BBC Political Editor Laura Kuenssberg whether he would be happy to order police or the military to shoot to kill if there was a similar attack on Britain's streets. Mr Corbyn said: "I'm not happy with the shoot-to-kill policy in general - I think that is quite dangerous and I think can often can be counterproductive. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34832023 Allowing terrorists to run amok, shooting people in restuarants and concert halls is "quite" dangerous too, you complete and utter bellend

Mr Corbyn was asked by BBC Political Editor Laura Kuenssberg whether he would be happy to order police or the military to shoot to kill if there was a similar attack on Britain's streets. Mr Corbyn said: "I'm not happy with the shoot-to-kill policy in general - I think that is quite dangerous and I think can often can be counterproductive. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34832023 Allowing terrorists to run amok, shooting people in restuarants and concert halls is "quite" dangerous too, you complete and utter bellend

When we burned people at the stake for witchcraft, executed people for heresy and catholics killed protestants and protestants killed catholics, were they not christians??? These fundamentalists are islamic, the difference is that the vast majority of muslims and christians have evolved over the last few hundred years.

If it was the other way round there would be a **** storm .. and this highlights the hypocrisy of many a lefty. where I come from, prejudice is prejudice, irrespective of race, gender, sexuality etc

A bit like labour using the worst terrorist attack in history to put out less favourable press releases. The Tories don't have a monopoly on being complete ****s

Interesting regarding these 'kit' type houses, which are pre-built in a warehouse and then installed on site. They can litereally put up an office block over a weekend. Seems popular in Germany and Sweden.

Ah, but it's fun bashing those tory ****s

I think it is reflective, but the current cross hairs need to move left and down 4 blocks