ItchenRob

Causeway or the Rat Race ?!

Yes, suffered this as well. Got home around 2.15 (near Horley). 3 1/2 hours sleep and I really do need my beauty sleep !

He looked in bad way to me and seemed to have gone a bit yellow. I alerted a steward who eventually went to see what was going on. I went back a bit later and he (the lad not the steward before anyone asks !) was at least sitting up and seemed conscious and was getting attention.

I am having problems with my Away s/t so emailed Dave Luker. I got a reply in under 2 minutes !! Very impressed.

So am I ! (I assume you mean the London EC2 version !?)

I have always bought a programme since I first started going in 1975 but I really wonder why sometimes, especially when the price is £3 (or £3.50 bizarrely at Blackpool). I have boxes of the things gathering dust. I find the older programmes (pre 1970) fascinating but they are so bland these days and full of advertising. I am thinking of only buying for new grounds or special games. I may reinvest my £3 in some older programmes. Friend I go with never buys one and I think he thinks I am a bit of a kn0b for doing so !

Never a big fan but I thought he was correct over the Thierry Henry affair (but he then backtracked!)

I went to the Fullbrook. Did not realise until this thread that it was advised aginst. It was fine until invaded by the yoof plus a few other well known faces whose "yoof" was well behind them !

I can see the back of my bald head in 2 shots at the pub !

Leeds are a much "bigger" club than us in probably every single measure of that term. Having lived in Norwich for 3 years its a very "different" place geographically, socially and culturally which might explain their bigger core support. Much as I like Norwich its a bit like an overgrown Royston Vasey!

Corp Ho : "As for The Dell averaging 95% capacity, we may get the odd **** crowd at Fratton like on Saturday (there's always the odd game where there's a low attendance for some reason - remind me which club holds the record for the lowest ever Prem attendance - whatever the reason may have been)" It's Wimbledon. HTH

Oh please no ! Have had dealings in a work capacity. He never let ignorance of the facts stand in his way in having an opinion on something.

Having tried to think the matter through for myself and looked at the definition of "Club" again for the umpteenth time it could clearly be "drafted better" and is at best ambiguous. Quite what a court would decide is anyone's guess but it totally clear the matter is far from free of doubt and this would appear to be borne out by the lawyers for Begbies and for Pinnacle. However, my judgement is clearly totaly addled as I am discussing such matters on a football supporters forum at almost 11 pm !

I am not sure how you can effectively say (if you are) that the regulations are deficient and bombproof at the same time. I also think you are reading in in too many assumptions about what constitutes the "Club". Also, I thought it was accepted knowledge that a QC acting for the Administrator thought we were 70% likely to succeed with an appeal. I think its arguable either way and would tend to agree with the 70% view

I might accept 2 but, being a solicitor, I would be interested in the legal technicalities as to why 1 is viewed as correct?

Yes - used to be the table footie which is now outside whch I am sure cannot be very good for it !

Oh dear forgot to "muti-quote" - I mean the Alex

We still go there - nine times out of ten we grab the table nearest the gents !

Pretty much my view. Legally "proof of funds" and "financial guarantees" could be quite distinct - alternatively they might amount to the same thing!

At last ! Not only pragmatic but technically legally correct IMHO.

Personally I dont think Shearar's heart would be in it. He would always be looking in a North Easterly direction. Perhaps more importantly I am not sure he is that inspiring either motivationally or tactically.

Cheers - I was probably being oversensitive anyway. Well done with all your efforts !

Excuse me - but how do you conclude from the perfectly innocent question I asked that I had not "grasp[ed] the message?!

Whilst it would appear that LC has made a bit of a gaff its not going to affect the technical legal argument so I don't think he has infact made it worse. I liked the bit from Mark Fry about this now being decided at the appropriate intellectual level !

I thought KD and Euell had foregone their wages - or was that just a rumour?