east-stand-nic
Members-
Posts
884 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by east-stand-nic
-
MP Diane Abbott 'sorry' over Twitter race comments - BBC News https://share.google/iygY09Fus66C1VswO Racism vs “racism”: why Diane Abbott was right | 33revolutionsperminute's Blog https://share.google/algXUviTFwT05l6cc Yep. She means nothing bad. Nothing to read into her comments over the years at all.
-
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
east-stand-nic replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
Ah i see....another jealous bitter pedo getting off on imaging young Thai girls. Sick. -
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
east-stand-nic replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
Doesn't effect me. But it is a clear plan by labour to help them win elections as everyone knows young people are idiots and vote idealistic. It's only when you live life and grow up you learn the truth of politics. -
My point was entirely correct and you know it. You are pious old racist with chronic double standard issues that get you caught out by everyone so very often. You fail to practice what you preach. You are an utter fool.
-
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
east-stand-nic replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
Your jealousy shines through. -
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
east-stand-nic replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
I know I have beaten you senseless when you start with the silly stereotype stuff. You have no other comeback as all of the points I raised are entirely correct. I wonder ....shall I stereotype about man who lives in the UK, too afraid to go out and see the world? Grow a pair and debate points raised you dumb fuck. -
My point was entirely correct. You just will not accept it.
-
I don't know. Perhaps a similar world to the one where people who disagree with leftist policy are labelled as racist Tommy Robinson loving Nazi's? After all these weeks off I was rather hoping you would have learned your lesson, but clearly not. You can indeed have your opinion, but ONLY if you accept others who have differing opinions on differing subject, which you don't.
-
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
east-stand-nic replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
Here he is, back and doing the same old boring shite. Racist old fool. -
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
east-stand-nic replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
Still obsessed with your superiors I see. Come on, man up. Get out doors and make something of yourself. -
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
east-stand-nic replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
Pure virtue signalling. But you are right, they are a danger but sadly the saturation point was reached years ago. Next step in the plan, lots of clashes between the men of fighting age from the boats vs. edl sorts. Perfect for the government to then introduce limits on numbers in a public gathering, a bit of Marshall law for a while, and some curfews thrown in. The perfect plan for population controlling. It's coming soon. -
Random Times You’ve Bumped Into A Rock/Pop Star
east-stand-nic replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
Thought of another one, but not sure it really qualifies as pop star. David Soul outside the Gaumont circa 1977-78 with my mum. As in I was with my mum....not him. ☺️ -
The ELO Discovery album in miss Selfridge London of all places. August 1979.
-
Random Times You’ve Bumped Into A Rock/Pop Star
east-stand-nic replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
Mark knopfler at Brands hatch formula one day a very long time ago.....in fact it might have been the last one there in 1986. -
Blimey, I really have got to you and under your skin haven't I. Perhaps I should back off making you look like a fool so much. I fear you may have a breakdown.
-
In fact I am so thick you have never once taken a point I have made and debated it. Not because you can't. No sir. What an utter dope you are. Learn. It's called debate.
-
Why does everyone have to stirrup so much shit.
-
That is just it. You are NOT. You only do it as you are incapable of answering points I make. You mock as you are beaten and have no comeback. That is a fact.
-
So thick that you cannot debate me. Surely if I am so think you can reply on the subject and make me look bad? Come along now.
-
Aw diddums. Have you worked it out yet?
-
LOL. It certainly has been lost on you, clearly. What an utter idiot. Would you like another chance to think about why I posted a link to an MSM article? 😂 God damn you are so easy to beat.
-
Yes that's right. You know them well I am sure. They are all part of the same group of MSM being told what to tell you and how to brainwash you. And it worked. hence you all believe stuff like this is coming and mask up and queue up for a vaccine that did not work and will not work next time either.
-
I guess this will strike terror into 90% of you on this forum: https://www.the-express.com/news/health/176533/covid-variant-Stratus-symptoms-explained Get masked up and get that new Vax. Roll up roll up. Does anyone honestly still believe this? Can you honestly not see it? Seriously: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-14872477/Covid-alert-ultra-catchy-Frankenstein-variant-explodes-data.html 😂
-
Nope. Please try again. Think about it long and hard and try again. I will not reply any further until someone can counter with something valid. Which I know none of you can.
-
So, there was no need to mention particular preferences in the way they did. A simple line up say we welcome applications from all walks of life, colour creed etc., call it what you will.....what they write was factually wrong and could be seen as anti white. If it was the other way around you libtards would be all over it. But as ever, because of your massive insecurities and internal hatred and need to be loved and liked, you kow tow to this way so that you can win accolades and friends by seeming so open and liberal. It was the wrong way to word it, as it clearly excludes or at the very least makes it clear white applicants will be considered less. Deal with it. See things for what they are, not what you want to see seen as you pious fool. In your highlighted section above you say someone would need to be making a point to say white applicants considered more important. So who was trying to make the point by saying non white more important and indeed, what point was that author making? You said it, so don't run away from the question.
