east-stand-nic

1. This thread is specifically about Donald Trump not Joe Biden. The particular discussion was about what Trump had actually done. It had nothing to do with what Biden may or may not have done (and what we do know with 100% certainty is what he actually did not do whilst President). Irrelevant and wrong yet again. Biden made a tweet accusing Trump of doing nothing about Meduro, FACT. Trump did. So, was Biden right or wrong? Also, the mere fact Biden said what he did shows he would also have done similar to Trump. And for FACT, nailed on, you would have supported Biden if he had done so. 2. You have absolutely no idea what my opinion would have been if Biden, when he was POTUS, had done what Trump has done now. See above. 3. It is extremely immature and myopic to accuse someone of only supporting the actions of people they “like” when they have a 20 year posting history with plenty of examples of criticising the actions of people they “like.” This is comedy gold because this is you to a tee. You have proven time and time again you have double standards and are a full on racist hypocrite. Troy's cut welfare, they are bad who only care about the rich., Followed up a year or two later with, Obviously Labour have done their sums and knew they ad to cut the heating allowance for pensioners. So, clear double standards for all to see. 4. You say that you see things “for what they really are.” Not only is that statement purely subjective, it is also made a lie by your support of many discredited conspiracy theories. I do see things as they are and with zero bias, where as you have a total myopic bias as displayed above and in many of your posts. 5. Another immature statement. You have no idea if I would have supported Biden if he had done what Trump has done. You have just constructed another conspiracy in your head and posted it as a fact. Yes, I do know because as shown with the labour example above, you always support whatever your people do that you support/like and go against anyone you do not like no matter they do good or not. It is proven. You have no way out. 6. You absolutely are a Trump apologist. You have never criticised anything that he has done and let’s face it, he is open to a great deal of criticism. You are often the first one on here to defend his latest disastrous decision or action or throw the TDS deflection around. You absolutely are a Muslim apologist as shown countless times on here. I am not a trump apologist as I have called him out on here many times and stated countless times (that you choose to ignore for some off reason) that i support none of them. All I do is show you to be the hypocrite by exposing you each time you berate Trump of farage or any other you have a childish dislike for by showing you that you have supported others that you do like who did the same thing. 7. For someone who does not support any of “them” you spend a lot of time either doing so on here or avoid criticism of “them” when they are open to it. See above. 8. When Islamic attacks occur I have called them out of extremist atrocities. How do you equate that with justification? A very simplistic and childish reaction. No, you never have. I would guess that in at least 4 of the last attacks all you have done is berated those who went off on one about Islamic terrorism, and then justify their actions by saying whites do the same thing but more. Are you seriously trying to deny you ever say this? Let me make it easier for you to understand the difference between an apologist and someone pointing out an obvious disconnect. A certain poster on here spends a lot of time posting about brown skinned, Muslim rape gangs. You will not find any posts from him about white non Muslim rape gangs.Why one and not the other? Pointing this fact out does not excuse the actions of the former group of men. It highlights a very clear bias. I have asked the question many times (and of you). Is the rape or murder of a women more serious if carried out by a brown skinned Muslim worse and more noteworthy than if committed by a white, non- Muslim? And I asked you (and you pretended not to see the question) if we were making our women safer or less safe but letting in all these unchecked immigrants? Can you now answer that? I know you think that you have a greater intellect than the rest of us, but good luck with trying to explain how you confuse this with apologising for the criminal actions Muslims. No, there is no one on here calling them brown skinned, only you. People have had enough of Muslim attacks and rape gangs. Have you not? Once again I have handed you your arse served up on a silver platter. 🤗 Nope, yet again you have made it so so easy for me to hang you out to dry.

Once again you show yourself to be an utter dope. Let me try to explain,. Biden said he stands with the people of Venezuela yes? And he accused trump of supporting Maduro. So, was he right or wrong? Also, it seems from that tweet Biden made that he would likely have taken some sort of action against Maduro himself. If he had you would 100% support it. But when Trump does it, you berate him. Your mindset is like a child. You can only support actions by people you like. I. on the other hand support no one and see things for what they really are, undeniable fact. My argument was in no way spurious. It was a factual article i saw about him trying to cut off Russia's illegal funding. It was also to oust a vile dictator and as already proven Biden felt the same and you would no doubt at all have supported any action her took, simply because he is not Trump. Childlike thinking. Now let's deal with your other double standards and idiotic stance about me being a Trump apologist and accusing me of abusing those who call him out. Wrong yet again in two ways. 1. I state facts that some of what trump does is good and correct. I have also stated many many times that I support none of them and think they are all self serving pricks. I do not abuse, I simply pick people up on double standards and having child like views. 2. When an Islamic attack occurs, the only thing you ever do is justify it (apologist) by making statements about white people doing it also. Would you care to explain in your own words why I am an apologist but you are not? Once again I have shown you the door and handed you your hat.

Once again you miss the point. Likely deliberately.

Like Biden himself, this did not age well. https://ibb.co/LDH8Cj12

Of course. It cannot possibly be true ... We all know that. Jeez.

You utter dope. I appreciate that no matter what he does, your TDS will not allow you to accept even the smallest possibly that it is true. Try reading up and researching. You might learn something. PS. I never mentioned Greenland. Try to stay on topic.

Not read up much have you. Of course none of this below is at all true. Jackass. This is the part that makes everything suddenly click — especially now that Maduro is in U.S. custody on narco-terrorism charges. Everyone thought this was just about Venezuela. It wasn’t. What just happened may be one of the hardest economic hits to the Kremlin since the Ukraine war began — and it didn’t require a single missile. Here’s the quiet mechanism most people missed: Russia can’t openly sell its oil because of sanctions. So Moscow adapted. It built a shadow system — unflagged tankers, erased records, rerouted shipping data — a ghost fleet. And one of the key laundering hubs? Venezuela. Maduro’s regime wasn’t just corrupt — it was a financial relay station. Russian oil moved through Venezuelan channels, blended, relabeled, and sold off the books. The same shadow network tied together Moscow, Caracas, and Tehran. Now look at what Donald Trump just did. The U.S. blocked Venezuelan oil tankers. On paper, that targets Maduro. In reality, it chokes Russia’s escape valve. If Venezuela stalls, the entire laundering pipeline collapses. Less oil sold quietly. Less cash reaching Moscow. More risk for any country trying to help Putin cheat sanctions. And the reactions tell the story. Vladimir Putin? Silent. But Dmitry Peskov suddenly looked nervous and warned, “This is dangerous. Venezuela is our ally.” That’s not concern for Maduro. That’s fear of exposure. Then comes the pressure point. Washington is now warning countries: keep buying Russian oil after rejecting Trump’s peace terms — and you’ll face consequences. Is it diplomacy? Is it blackmail? Or is it something far more effective — economic suffocation? This is the war nobody sees on the battlefield. No tanks. No headlines. No dramatic explosions. Just shadow fleets drying up. Cash flows freezing. And regimes realizing their backdoor just got slammed shut. If the ghost oil stops moving… How long can the Kremlin keep the war machine running? This wasn’t chaos. This wasn’t coincidence. This was a silent strike — and it may end up reshaping the global balance far faster than anyone expected.

Here u go again trying to make up things people said. You are utterly disgusting to try and use such an illness to point score. He always does this. he is a very insecure sort of racist chap. He likes to try and make out you say stuff you didn't.

Self awareness not your strong point then? Mind you, have you even got a strong point?

Wrong yet again. My post was 100% Fact again loser. LOL again. You think I vote for any of them. Read the room dopey.

I was quite old when I learned MSM lie and only report on what they are told to report on and what to say. That said, I still learned way ahead of most on here who still guzzle up every last drop they report.

At least be man enough to admit what you are dopey.

You know you have ... all you left leaning libtards do it. When Tories do it, = bad and don't care. When Starmer does it, he had no choice, did his sums, right thing blah blah blah. Both sides are pretty much the same. So blinkered and unable to see the truth that neither side gives a shit about the average person.

Pot, kettle, black.

Good god. You dopey old racist.

OMG. You dopey old racist hypocrite yet again.

A bit like the mass denial on here about South Africa yes? Or, was that perhaps just silliness by most on here just because it was me who said it. Jeez. https://www.saintsweb.co.uk/topic/60977-the-starmer-years-can-the-new-broom-sweep-clean/page/108/#comment-3526046

Why oh why does the truth bother you so much dopey? So I know people from all over the world and have traveled. So what. So I get to hear stuff that you dont on MSM who are clearly bias. Suck it up buttercup.

Driving home for Christmas and Road to Hell, two of the best tunes to drive to at night, without doubt. RIP sir.

No, there isn't in this context. You really do need to try harder to understand.

Nope. Once again I have outed you as an opinionated double standards swine. You are OK to sit and enjoy TV made 50 years ago, but if anyone dare to like something lade recently that you think is bad, it makes them stuck in the 70's where as you are not. Hilarious stuff. So I assume you will refuse to watch Monty python reruns? Idiot. When it was written is irrelevant, your words were if anyone likes it, they are stuck in the 70's. The same era as TV shows you stated you liked 😁so, but definition you are also stuck in the 70's. The end.

So if someone likes Mrs browns boys they are stuck in 70s yes? However, someone who still likes Monty Python and Fawlty Towers has evolved? Can you honestly not see how fucking idiotic you are?

Once again you make yourself look rather silly. People stuck in the 70s? Would that be people who like Monty python and Fawlty towers?

No difference at all. They are making a habit of not allowing people to vote. That is a dictators way of ruling. So, correct as ever thanks. Suck it up and own it. You support a dictator.

Mayoral elections on top of council elections. Care to apologise now for yet another childish rant when I am in fact correct?