east-stand-nic

Yes indeed, as I have said many times you must research ALL channels of news, not JUST MSM as often they are towing the narrative LINE. Fact is you have learnt that what some people say is always BS, SOG and MentalMickey two who will NEVER tell the truth as they dislike someone. You had the nerve to post that in fact Farage had condemned trump as he has done many times. They will NEVER accept that, even though it is staring them in the face. That has been my point on here from day one. Myopic childlike views. Now it is starting to shine through as true.

Nope. Wrong again. And you were wrong again as shown by Badger post. Maybe do a little research before spouting off LOL. How silly you look once again.

He also called trump out on tarrifs the other day. The likes of sog and mental Mickey don't see this as they do not read anything other than what they agree with. Good to see you are learning though.

Thank you for proving me right. The fact is we HAVE allowed many terrorists in, with active records and being known to be hate speech types. So, starmer is ok to let them in, rapists and such like bit not someone with a different opinion. So, he is every bit as bad as trump. Thanks for helping to prove this point As with racist song. Thanks for proving my point that starmer is as bad as trump. But as ever, you only call out one of them and not both, as you should. OMG. Talk about addled brain. No, if you were a fascist, you would not be upset about her visa being revoked, which you are not ... Ergo you have just proven yourself a fascist. If you were not a fascist you would be upset about people having visas blocked based only on having different political views. By the way, a clue for you, an islamic extremist promoting death to infidels is not the same. And how many have they not banned? How many have they knowing and willfully allowed in? Labour loves and supports Islam. That is a fact. That is why you all laugh at me as you hate me being right and having the balls to say things for what they are. The fact is you all call out trump on things that starmer does all the time. You don't call out starmer as you are myopic childlike people who play favourites rather than opening your eyes to see they are all scum in their own unique ways.

Good god. So starmer allows free speech does he. Did he not just block a Dutch lady's visa? No question at all you are a closet fascist. Along with being incredibly thick and racist.

Is that the Chinese that owns starmer? https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/2160254/Keir-Starmer-China-Donald-Trump-Vladimir-Putin?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPe0CljbGNrA97P12V4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHotLY7GwxbWrcbB2ADSWQlfjTJ2koWq0hTgIiO6009B6kayFCVTu8T3zDam1_aem_cHSw6Jy8WNZOn4bHJGZ5fg Meanwhile, The next time Lisa Nandy throws around the word “fascism” ask her which party is scrapping elections, jury trials, shutting down debate over Islam through a blasphemy law, imposed online censorship & slashed free speech through non-crime hate incidents.

Perhaps I think the same of some of your posts and that of others. So, when I do it, it is cretinous, but when you do it, it is OK? So once again, you are not allowing me to have an opinion. In any case, the point was that I post nothing buy LOL's, which is in fact not true and I post far less of them than you do. But I was noting with interest that Egg wants to call me out about it, but not you. Childlike views yet again. Perhaps I think the same of some of your posts and that of others. So, when I do it, it is cretinous, but when you do it, it is OK? So once again, you are not allowing me to have an opinion. In any case, the point was that I post nothing buy LOL's, which is in fact not true and I post far less of them than you do. But I was noting with interest that Egg wants to call me out about it, but not you. Childlike views yet again. Deliberate avoidance of my question pretending to misread. Ask Egg, he brought it up first not me. You see this is why I trip you all up so easily. You take sides (like you do with politics) based on personal preference and not FACT. Mental mickey puts an emoji on 99% of my posts. I do not do the same to him. But you and egg et al do not bring that up. Totally childlike.

As mental mickey does to me, but I guess you will not be calling him out for that, yes? Also, do you condone Whelk calling me Paedo Boy? Think long and hard about your answer.

Whoops. https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/politics/labour-msp-pam-duncan-glancy-36436331

Bit you said you never read my posts and ignore most of the anyway. Outed again.

Why would it not? Starmer cancels elections but that is ok?

Good god. I give up.

Oh dear. I will try one last time. Were Lenin and Stalin both Marxist? Yes. Were Lenin and Stalin both Fascist dictators? Yes. So you see, with a little bit of outside the MSM box thinking you can quickly deduce that there is such a thing as a Marxist who can also have Fascist style rule. Come back with whatever BS you want, the fact is, that in History we have had Fascist rules who have adopted Marxism as their way. So, ergo, they are both. Would you like your hat?

So you accept you do wish him and others dead then. Cool. At least we can see just how vile you are. And I note you are not mentioning the other fascist statement you made about how you wished some people were not allowed the vote. Another thing you meant but deny. Utter vile fascist coward.

Own it you coward. You know what you meant. Don't try making excuses after. If you had your way, many of us would not be allowed to vote. You said it and you think it. You also clearly wish death upon trump. You said it not once but twice. Be a man and own it. Accept your words. Dont rum away after being caught out.

Must do better. Outed again. A "communist fascist" isn't a standard political term but describes systems or ideologies that blend elements of communism (state control, class struggle focus) with fascism (extreme nationalism, authoritarianism, hierarchy), often seen in dictatorships like Stalin's USSR or Mao's China, where totalitarian state power mimics fascist control despite communist aims, or used pejoratively to link far-left authoritarianism to far-right fascist methods, as seen in the historical concept of "social fascism" used by communists against social democrats.

So, you want to stop people voting if they have a different view to you and you wish death on people. What a lovely chap you are.

You will not engage as you cannot. I am correct. If I was wrong you would prove it. Oh dear, read above from Egg about being rude. No doubt he will accept it when you and the other fascists are rude, but not when I do it. Same old double standards lefty loons.

Sadly for you, it is your bosom buddy who has been caught out, yet again with his Marxist Fascist ways. Being that you support him at every post, one can only assume you agree with his Marxist Fascist ways.

Yep. Same old same old. Cannot answer a simple question as it shows you do indeed have double standards again. Just wanted to check. That'll do for me.

So, all the uproar on here about Trump banning people and making visas harder etc, NOT OK. But Starmer does the same thing here and bans someone due to their OPINION and it is OK yes?

Seems Starmer has gone a bit Trumpesque then.....of course no doubt the dictatorship apologists will say this is completely different. It isn't. No matter what you say. They let in KNOWN terrorists, so why not this lady? He is a dictator. Accept it. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/grok-starmer-elon-musk-eva-vlaardingerbroek-ban-b2900753.html

Joaquin Phoenix as the Joker Billy Bob Thornton as Carl Childers in Sling Blade Rami Malek as Freddie Mercury in Bohemian Rhapsody Alan Rickman as Snape in all the Potter movies Robin Williams in One Hour Photo Val Kilmer as Doc Holliday in Tombstone I also love most of what Denzel Washington is in and thought he was mega in The equalizer movies. Also agree very much with mentions already for Javier Bardem in no country for old men and Joe Pesci in both Goodfellas and Casino.

Good luck trying to get most on here to accept that this is even slightly possible. As you can see, most will not even read ti saying they were 'Bored'. As I have said above also, too many myopic views here based on personal bias. God knows I hate all politicians and people in power, but I just cannot figure the human brain that refuses to listen to another possibility without just calling it conspiracy based. I have written similar to you about what DT has done and got the usual emoji's from the brain dead. This is why the world is so divided now. Too many like this out there that refuse to see another angle to thing, whether proven true or not they will call it a lie if it does not suit their opinion on the PERSON as opposed to viewing the situation for what it is.

1. This thread is specifically about Donald Trump not Joe Biden. The particular discussion was about what Trump had actually done. It had nothing to do with what Biden may or may not have done (and what we do know with 100% certainty is what he actually did not do whilst President). Irrelevant and wrong yet again. Biden made a tweet accusing Trump of doing nothing about Meduro, FACT. Trump did. So, was Biden right or wrong? Also, the mere fact Biden said what he did shows he would also have done similar to Trump. And for FACT, nailed on, you would have supported Biden if he had done so. 2. You have absolutely no idea what my opinion would have been if Biden, when he was POTUS, had done what Trump has done now. See above. 3. It is extremely immature and myopic to accuse someone of only supporting the actions of people they “like” when they have a 20 year posting history with plenty of examples of criticising the actions of people they “like.” This is comedy gold because this is you to a tee. You have proven time and time again you have double standards and are a full on racist hypocrite. Troy's cut welfare, they are bad who only care about the rich., Followed up a year or two later with, Obviously Labour have done their sums and knew they ad to cut the heating allowance for pensioners. So, clear double standards for all to see. 4. You say that you see things “for what they really are.” Not only is that statement purely subjective, it is also made a lie by your support of many discredited conspiracy theories. I do see things as they are and with zero bias, where as you have a total myopic bias as displayed above and in many of your posts. 5. Another immature statement. You have no idea if I would have supported Biden if he had done what Trump has done. You have just constructed another conspiracy in your head and posted it as a fact. Yes, I do know because as shown with the labour example above, you always support whatever your people do that you support/like and go against anyone you do not like no matter they do good or not. It is proven. You have no way out. 6. You absolutely are a Trump apologist. You have never criticised anything that he has done and let’s face it, he is open to a great deal of criticism. You are often the first one on here to defend his latest disastrous decision or action or throw the TDS deflection around. You absolutely are a Muslim apologist as shown countless times on here. I am not a trump apologist as I have called him out on here many times and stated countless times (that you choose to ignore for some off reason) that i support none of them. All I do is show you to be the hypocrite by exposing you each time you berate Trump of farage or any other you have a childish dislike for by showing you that you have supported others that you do like who did the same thing. 7. For someone who does not support any of “them” you spend a lot of time either doing so on here or avoid criticism of “them” when they are open to it. See above. 8. When Islamic attacks occur I have called them out of extremist atrocities. How do you equate that with justification? A very simplistic and childish reaction. No, you never have. I would guess that in at least 4 of the last attacks all you have done is berated those who went off on one about Islamic terrorism, and then justify their actions by saying whites do the same thing but more. Are you seriously trying to deny you ever say this? Let me make it easier for you to understand the difference between an apologist and someone pointing out an obvious disconnect. A certain poster on here spends a lot of time posting about brown skinned, Muslim rape gangs. You will not find any posts from him about white non Muslim rape gangs.Why one and not the other? Pointing this fact out does not excuse the actions of the former group of men. It highlights a very clear bias. I have asked the question many times (and of you). Is the rape or murder of a women more serious if carried out by a brown skinned Muslim worse and more noteworthy than if committed by a white, non- Muslim? And I asked you (and you pretended not to see the question) if we were making our women safer or less safe but letting in all these unchecked immigrants? Can you now answer that? I know you think that you have a greater intellect than the rest of us, but good luck with trying to explain how you confuse this with apologising for the criminal actions Muslims. No, there is no one on here calling them brown skinned, only you. People have had enough of Muslim attacks and rape gangs. Have you not? Once again I have handed you your arse served up on a silver platter. 🤗 Nope, yet again you have made it so so easy for me to hang you out to dry.