east-stand-nic
Members-
Posts
1,001 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by east-stand-nic
-
What? So are your beloved Muslim Labour party not doing anything about this profiteering? I mean to say, is that not a Tory thing....surely labour care about you and want to being prices down no? Learning yet? They are all the same. Note for the incredibly thick whelk....it was sog complaining about prices not me . I don't need heating . What an absolute dope you are 😂
-
Lovely to watch. Classic TDS. No doubt the usual suspects will deny it of course, but the fact is he though he was talking about Trump, so he started to criticise the statement, but it was about Obama LOL. Nope. Untrue, fake, nothing to see here.
-
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
east-stand-nic replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
Perhaps, perhaps not. Who know. I am guessing you all know they have factually fallen and this is BS as ever as it opposes it. Whether the Labour government has "faked" NHS waiting list reductions is a matter of political dispute, with evidence suggesting that while lists have fallen, the methods used to achieve this and the way they are presented are contested . Independent fact-checkers and analysts have provided the following context: Waiting Lists Have Fallen: Data from NHS England shows that the elective treatment waiting list in England did fall from approximately 7.62 million in July 2024 to around 7.39 million by September 2025. Contested Data Methods: Accusations of "faking" or inflating the figures stem from the use of "validation" payments, where trusts are paid to review waiting lists to remove patients who have died, moved away, or no longer require treatment. "Cosmetic" vs. "Clinical" Reductions: Critics argue these list clean-ups (validations) are a "cosmetic" reduction rather than a result of increased treatment capacity. However, a Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson stated that over 85% of removals are due to direct care. Graph Controversies: Labour has been criticized for using social media graphs that did not have labeled axes and appeared to merge two different datasets—one showing "patients" and another showing "treatments"—making the reduction appear more significant than it was. Conclusion: It is accurate to say that NHS waiting lists have decreased, but analysts and opposition figures argue that the scale of the reduction has been exaggerated by Labour, largely because a significant portion of the reduction came from cleaning up lists (validations) rather than treating more people. -
Left loony libtard translator says 'Yep he is right but I am not going to admit it'.
-
LOL like fuck at this post. You are the pedo apologist as you love muslims and want us to let them in and allow them to roam the streets raping women and kids. I want it stopped, you dont. So you are the one supporting it. It really is very simple. Do illegal immigrant commit rape crimes, yes or no. Answer = YES So, have rape crimes increased since we let them in, yes or no. Answer = YES So, are our women and children at more risk or less risk by letting them in? Answer = MORE You cannot and will not accept it. Your need to virtue signal is more important that the safety of women and children, That is pretty vile. Try posting on the right thread next time thicko pedo supporter.
-
The stupidity is wholly yours. Your statement is childlike nonsense with no rationale or reasoning what so ever. Let me see if you are capable of answering a simple question. Have rapes and crimes again women gone up or down since we let in all these EU checked illegal immigrants and allowed them freedom of the streets?
-
As expected, you avoided the question yet again for ALL to see. It is not being dense you dope, it is you. Read it again and again and maybe your penny will drop. I have no agenda other than to want women and children to be as safe as they can be, and factually, by letting in some many unvetted males (who then rape etc) we are putting them at a HIGHER risk than if we did not let them in. You just cannot bring yourself to accept it can you, because you love Muslims. Also, women and kids are much more like to be raped by immigrant on a proportional basis and that is a fact. I don't care who the perpetrators are, I just want to limit the risk to our women and children, and we can do that by stopping all this illegal immigration, and that you dopey racist is a fact!
-
Shall I make you look the asshole that you are by asking the question again that you refused to answer 7+ times before? By allowing undocumented and unvetted illegal immigrants into the country and allowing them freedom to roam the streets, are we making our women and children more or less safe than if we did not allow them in? I cannot wait to see your answer. It will be utter tripe as ever. The only racist on here is YOU. You have Jews and you hate white people. I hate no one. I just hate rapists and paedo's. Hence I think these illegals should be turned away. Anyone who wants our streets to be as safe as possible would agree with that.
-
Unlike Starmer and the Minnesota governor who you support. Both making millions and millions while in power. Jeez, Myopic blinkered views yet again. See the big picture you dope. They are all doing it. The Clintons are rich as hell AFTER his term in the hot seat. Stop the TDS and realise the truth, they are all self servicing cunts.
-
Of course, had have been two white guys draped in the flag there would be no outrage. Jeez.
-
Starmer has made it very clear he sides with the Muslims. They are his priority. The usual childlike minds will LOL this post now, but I am as ever correct. Starmer supports globalization and the destruction of England and its English identity.
-
I see the libard left are out protesting the attacks on Iran, but where were they protesting against the Iranian regime mowing down their own in cars and shooting them on site in the street? Similar to those who protested against attacking Hitler in 1939. Leave Hitler alone. Leave the Iranian supreme leader alone. Utter nutters who are clearly deranged and confused. Good god, there are even libtards out there protesting with banners to say stop the terrorism act now,. What is wrong with you all?
-
A perfect example of cognitive dissonance. You never agree with Carlson, but now you praise him ONLY because he said something that suits your opinion or the narative. Amazing childlike views and ways.
-
sorry, I am not a peado protecting labour liberal type. You all are.
-
Yep, no reason at all as all of this is fake...yes, anything like this must be fake as it goes against what you believe, I know that. Fool. OBAMA JUST LAWYERED UP. AND NOW WE KNOW WHY. Barack Hussein Obama has retained a team of 9 criminal defense attorneys. Not civil. Not advisory. Criminal. The same man who told you “Hope and Change” is now preparing for a federal grand jury subpoena expected by March 7. ⚡️ THE $150 BILLION LIE In 2016, Obama sent Iran $150 billion and $1.7 billion in physical cash — pallets of money loaded onto unmarked cargo planes in the middle of the night. He told you it was a nuclear deal. It wasn’t. The DOJ files released yesterday show that $2.3 billion of Epstein’s network ran through Iranian banks. Deutsche Bank. JPMorgan. And Bank Melli Iran — a state-owned bank under Obama’s “nuclear deal” exemptions. Obama didn’t pay Iran to stop enriching uranium. He paid Iran to store the evidence. The server farm. The blackmail tapes. The financial records. All moved to Tehran between 2016 and 2019 — on Obama’s watch, through Obama’s channels, with Obama’s money. Trump just sent the military to recover it. Now Obama needs 9 lawyers. 🔻 THE HARVARD CONNECTION Two days ago, Lawrence Summers — Obama’s top economic advisor and former Harvard president — resigned from Harvard without explanation. His name appears on the Butterfly Foundation recipient list. The $340 million Epstein trust. Summers met with Epstein at least 14 times after his 2008 conviction. At Harvard. At the mansion. At the island. Obama appointed him as Director of the National Economic Council in 2009 — one year after Epstein’s conviction. Not despite the connection. Because of it. ⚡️ THE CLINTON TESTIMONY Bill Clinton testified under subpoena before the House Oversight Committee this week. First time in history a former president was deposed in a criminal investigation by Congress. Hillary testified separately. Behind closed doors. But here’s what matters: Clinton was asked about Obama. Specifically about a 2015 meeting at the Clinton Foundation where Obama, Clinton, Summers, and Epstein’s lawyer were all present. The subject of that meeting? “Asset relocation.” Assets. Not money. Not investments. Evidence. 🔻 THE TIMELINE 2015 — Meeting at Clinton Foundation. “Asset relocation” discussed. 2016 — Obama sends $150 billion to Iran. Pallets of cash. 2017 — NSA intercepts CIA black site communications inside Iran. 2019 — Epstein arrested. Then murdered. Tapes “disappear.” 2025 — Trump returns. Bondi appointed. Investigation reopens. 2026 — US military recovers tapes from Tehran. Obama lawyers up. Every dot connects. Every dollar traces back. Every lie has an expiration date. And Obama’s just expired.
-
OBAMA JUST LAWYERED UP. AND NOW WE KNOW WHY. Barack Hussein Obama has retained a team of 9 criminal defense attorneys. Not civil. Not advisory. Criminal. The same man who told you “Hope and Change” is now preparing for a federal grand jury subpoena expected by March 7. ⚡️ THE $150 BILLION LIE In 2016, Obama sent Iran $150 billion and $1.7 billion in physical cash — pallets of money loaded onto unmarked cargo planes in the middle of the night. He told you it was a nuclear deal. It wasn’t. The DOJ files released yesterday show that $2.3 billion of Epstein’s network ran through Iranian banks. Deutsche Bank. JPMorgan. And Bank Melli Iran — a state-owned bank under Obama’s “nuclear deal” exemptions. Obama didn’t pay Iran to stop enriching uranium. He paid Iran to store the evidence. The server farm. The blackmail tapes. The financial records. All moved to Tehran between 2016 and 2019 — on Obama’s watch, through Obama’s channels, with Obama’s money. Trump just sent the military to recover it. Now Obama needs 9 lawyers. 🔻 THE HARVARD CONNECTION Two days ago, Lawrence Summers — Obama’s top economic advisor and former Harvard president — resigned from Harvard without explanation. His name appears on the Butterfly Foundation recipient list. The $340 million Epstein trust. Summers met with Epstein at least 14 times after his 2008 conviction. At Harvard. At the mansion. At the island. Obama appointed him as Director of the National Economic Council in 2009 — one year after Epstein’s conviction. Not despite the connection. Because of it. ⚡️ THE CLINTON TESTIMONY Bill Clinton testified under subpoena before the House Oversight Committee this week. First time in history a former president was deposed in a criminal investigation by Congress. Hillary testified separately. Behind closed doors. But here’s what matters: Clinton was asked about Obama. Specifically about a 2015 meeting at the Clinton Foundation where Obama, Clinton, Summers, and Epstein’s lawyer were all present. The subject of that meeting? “Asset relocation.” Assets. Not money. Not investments. Evidence. 🔻 THE TIMELINE 2015 — Meeting at Clinton Foundation. “Asset relocation” discussed. 2016 — Obama sends $150 billion to Iran. Pallets of cash. 2017 — NSA intercepts CIA black site communications inside Iran. 2019 — Epstein arrested. Then murdered. Tapes “disappear.” 2025 — Trump returns. Bondi appointed. Investigation reopens. 2026 — US military recovers tapes from Tehran. Obama lawyers up. Every dot connects. Every dollar traces back. Every lie has an expiration date. And Obama’s just expired.
-
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
east-stand-nic replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
As you have seen clearly and on countless occasions he will never give an opinion or tell someone why they are wrong. He is incapable. He is I suspect about 17 years old. His attempts to be funny are useless also. -
Utterly disgusting to attack Iran. Just the same as all the countries Obama bombed during his term, agreed? Should have kept out of it, I mean all they were doing was murder their own people, mowing them down in the streets etc. Hence no lefty loons went on protest marches about it, as it was nothing.
-
I can't speak for those in the Middle East so much, although I did spells there. However, I have been in Thailand for 2 Coups, plus the red shirt riots and protests of 2010. Like most people, we just get on with life, as you all do in the UK even though you have the constant threat of being stabbed (or raped if you are white and under 16). Edit. Good friend of mine was coming to see me next Sunday, but his flight was cancelled. Shit happens.
-
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
east-stand-nic replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
However, when the Tories took over in 2010 they did not need 8 years or more. People like you and sog etc., we're all over them complaining etc., after a year or two. Double standards part 372. -
Did you miss his question about Boycott? 😁
-
Sadly for mental Mickey, I called it right at 1-3. Still, he likes to make himself look the twat he is on a regular basis.
-
Here's the real bugger, they have not won a home game in the league all season. We all know how good SFC are at breaking records. Best not this time! I am thinking we will struggle a bit early doors but run out 1-3 winners.
-
Mandleson arrested. Thoughts on starmer having to now resign?
-
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
east-stand-nic replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
So,Mandleson arrested. Hmm. Where are all the calls for starmer to resign? I should imagine trump would be crucified by now if he had some one in his cabinet of this Ilk. Lefty woke libtard hypocrisy strikes again.
