east-stand-nic

So, as a law abiding citizen and knowing that US law enforcement are armed, would you turn up to a place where they are doing their job in arresting people, block them,. harass them and on top of that be in possession of a firearm? Please do not come back with your usual BS about 2nd amendment rights etc. The fact is, if you know the USA and its law enforcement, you would stay away, not interfere and certainly not be carrying a gun with you to a so called peaceful protest. Think about it. Cue mental mickey and his LOL emoji, which is OK for him to use on all my posts but wrong when I use even one, and cue all the other libtard retards saying this and that. My statement above is again totally correct and factual. So, I will not be drawn into any silliness.

Is that similar to how you can NEVER bring yourself to condemn a Muslim terror attack incident?

Oh dear, caught another one out who cannot read. Try again. I was not asking him to reply NOW, I was stating that in his previous he reply he had NOT replied to the points I made. LOL. I note also with interest that he replied just a few minutes after you, so in fact he was not focused on the Derby game. Blimey you guys are oh so easy. Oh dear part 137. Once again you cannot actually respond to my points. I will help you out a bit. You cannot and do not reply to the actual points I made because they are factually correct. You just deflect and start talking about something else LOL. OK, so how about have a go and try to reply to the points I made and show me why they are clueless? No? Thought not. Another libtard retard who deflects when confronted with facts. Am I not right in saying that for many of those years he was on 3 posts a day restriction?

So as I expected, no reply at all to what I posted, just note irrelevant, deflective nonsense.

OK, so instead of the usual libtard feet stamping when confronted with FACTS, try telling me what part of what I said is not true? Oh, you can't. OK, Understood.

Is that the same as the Obama Gestapo? He used Ice and deported Millions, but it is interesting no one complained. CNN even supported it when he did it. It is called TDS. https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1C6fnLTJH4/ https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1AgHmqiriY/ https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1MAY3dMixG/ No doubt the usual Fascist hypocritical suspects will say it was totally different when Obama did it.

Yes indeed, as I have said many times you must research ALL channels of news, not JUST MSM as often they are towing the narrative LINE. Fact is you have learnt that what some people say is always BS, SOG and MentalMickey two who will NEVER tell the truth as they dislike someone. You had the nerve to post that in fact Farage had condemned trump as he has done many times. They will NEVER accept that, even though it is staring them in the face. That has been my point on here from day one. Myopic childlike views. Now it is starting to shine through as true.

Nope. Wrong again. And you were wrong again as shown by Badger post. Maybe do a little research before spouting off LOL. How silly you look once again.

He also called trump out on tarrifs the other day. The likes of sog and mental Mickey don't see this as they do not read anything other than what they agree with. Good to see you are learning though.

Thank you for proving me right. The fact is we HAVE allowed many terrorists in, with active records and being known to be hate speech types. So, starmer is ok to let them in, rapists and such like bit not someone with a different opinion. So, he is every bit as bad as trump. Thanks for helping to prove this point As with racist song. Thanks for proving my point that starmer is as bad as trump. But as ever, you only call out one of them and not both, as you should. OMG. Talk about addled brain. No, if you were a fascist, you would not be upset about her visa being revoked, which you are not ... Ergo you have just proven yourself a fascist. If you were not a fascist you would be upset about people having visas blocked based only on having different political views. By the way, a clue for you, an islamic extremist promoting death to infidels is not the same. And how many have they not banned? How many have they knowing and willfully allowed in? Labour loves and supports Islam. That is a fact. That is why you all laugh at me as you hate me being right and having the balls to say things for what they are. The fact is you all call out trump on things that starmer does all the time. You don't call out starmer as you are myopic childlike people who play favourites rather than opening your eyes to see they are all scum in their own unique ways.

Good god. So starmer allows free speech does he. Did he not just block a Dutch lady's visa? No question at all you are a closet fascist. Along with being incredibly thick and racist.

Is that the Chinese that owns starmer? https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/2160254/Keir-Starmer-China-Donald-Trump-Vladimir-Putin?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPe0CljbGNrA97P12V4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHotLY7GwxbWrcbB2ADSWQlfjTJ2koWq0hTgIiO6009B6kayFCVTu8T3zDam1_aem_cHSw6Jy8WNZOn4bHJGZ5fg Meanwhile, The next time Lisa Nandy throws around the word “fascism” ask her which party is scrapping elections, jury trials, shutting down debate over Islam through a blasphemy law, imposed online censorship & slashed free speech through non-crime hate incidents.

Perhaps I think the same of some of your posts and that of others. So, when I do it, it is cretinous, but when you do it, it is OK? So once again, you are not allowing me to have an opinion. In any case, the point was that I post nothing buy LOL's, which is in fact not true and I post far less of them than you do. But I was noting with interest that Egg wants to call me out about it, but not you. Childlike views yet again. Perhaps I think the same of some of your posts and that of others. So, when I do it, it is cretinous, but when you do it, it is OK? So once again, you are not allowing me to have an opinion. In any case, the point was that I post nothing buy LOL's, which is in fact not true and I post far less of them than you do. But I was noting with interest that Egg wants to call me out about it, but not you. Childlike views yet again. Deliberate avoidance of my question pretending to misread. Ask Egg, he brought it up first not me. You see this is why I trip you all up so easily. You take sides (like you do with politics) based on personal preference and not FACT. Mental mickey puts an emoji on 99% of my posts. I do not do the same to him. But you and egg et al do not bring that up. Totally childlike.

As mental mickey does to me, but I guess you will not be calling him out for that, yes? Also, do you condone Whelk calling me Paedo Boy? Think long and hard about your answer.

Whoops. https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/politics/labour-msp-pam-duncan-glancy-36436331