Farmer Saint

Well, some people don't earn enough to save for anything, let alone retirement. It is an outdated concept though, and should be changed along with the triple lock. Essentially it should be means tested, but again that's very difficult to do as it really depends on what type of pension you have, if drawdown and your investments fall, do you get access to the state pension again, etc etc. Unfortunately there are too many potential holes that means a lot of people could fall through the net.

Absolutely, if we get it at all.

I'm not eligible for 27 years, so it's unlikely pensions won't be means tested by then, and unless I really fuck up I won't pass that.

MB is reliable.

It's an odd one - I have used private healthcare since I've been of employable age, and I won't get a pension or use government funded social care. Wonder if I'll get an NI refund?

Angry British white men being angry.

No, it's an X problem. Along with racism, fascism and homophobia, but then some X users support those causes, eh Alex?

But not commenting shows an implicit endorsement of the post - that's the issue. Got no idea what that second sentence says. "What do you do with the drunken sailor early in the morning" and all that jazz.

Yes, because I don't have X so it doesn't let me read the full post/article.

Why would you post something you don't agree with and then not comment on that post to say you don't agree with it?

Because a lot of non-racist people don't have it and can't read the full articles.

Who's "we"? All I am asking is not to post articles from X.

"It didn't" what?

You didn't post a BBC article on X. All you did was post from a right wing influencer. Why would you post a BBC article from X when you can post it from the BBC site?

Nick Sorter on the BBC is he? No, he's a right wing influencer. It takes a lot to be told this at 7.20am, but I think you need a timeout mate. Go gather yourself and have a think about what you're trying to post.

I think dropping people on fires to put them out is pretty barbaric, although I'm sure there are lots of people on this forum that would support it.

You won't get respect if you post from X, and rightly so.

Do you think we'd have done better had we dived to get a player of theirs sent off?

Yes, it's a news story? Are you missing the point here?

This "I know that you are, but what am I" schtick is very 1980's playground. If that's the best you've got no wonder you get X to form your opinions for you.

Alex is a plum if that helps?

Just read into things first before just blindly posting - that's all we're asking.

Such a good comeback you had to post it separately 😂

This falls into two main areas. Theoretical changes to a game, and material changes to the conditions the game is played under. The second has far more affect on the game, and should therefore be more heavily punished.

And? You were talking about team selection as well. Out of interest, how did we get on with this additional tactical information in the games? Was there a material improvement in our performance do you think?