Farmer Saint

Not sure you can make the point you did above and take the moral high ground when your solution to illegal immigration included killing people.

What a low IQ comment 😉

Air traffic control glitch, my arse.

There is a reason these people are stereotyped. It's because the stereotype holds.

Well, some of the British public don't. Others seem to. He's just a modern day gypsy, go where the laws don't apply to him. The irony is that I've had my move to Canada approved, so as soon as some family issues have sorted themselves I become another fake statistic from a right wing think tank.

That's to be accepted, surely? In general your subs are not better, otherwise they'd be starting??

Spent it on St George's flags and white and red paint.

Please stop quoting him, I like not seeing his gaslighting bullshit. No one ever said they weren't leaving. We said they weren't leaving at a significantly larger rate to what they have done in the past or anymore than other societies (for example the US). They are moving to low tax societies where they can get away with paying nothing or next to nothing. Nowt we can do about that.

No it's not, because one billionaire staying would pay off every single billionaire that leaves.

Absolutely, it's a very unpalatable solution, as most are.

So we need to reduce tax for billionaires to £100k PA then. What's the point in that, we'd still lose £329,900,000 in tax revenue in relation to this greedy cunt?

The education is around the reality of moving abroad and ensuring they're not conned by people traffickers. Massive investment is needed to increase living standards in these countries so that they don't want to move on. It's all driven by global inequality, so we need to solve the trigger.

Yes, but in this case they wouldn't be able to try.

What does my last point have to do with Brexit?

That's where the confirmation with their countries come in - this is what takes the time at the moment with applications, it's verifying they are who they say they are. However, the point is, and I'll repeat it, that they cannot claim asylum here, so it's irrelevant, they will never be allowed to stay, and they will stay in detention until they return. It's the deterrent that is needed.

Just because you don't accept it, it doesn't make it so. The French and Germans take in far more every year than we do.

The Reform leader started it, the Tories continued it. Amazing how the right have caused, exacerbated and prolonged the issue.

We're open to hear your ideas, but as ever you are yet to come up with anything mildly workable. This is the problem with low IQ people, they can't do logic, process and detail.

They have to give a country of origin that gets verified with their home country, but it's more that it is a deterrent as they will not be granted asylum irrespective of this.

They are workable solutions - you are yet to come up with one. If you want to stop the boats, this is the kind of thinking you have to adopt. You have to deal with the causes otherwise it will never stop.

Nope, I have solutions. 1. Reopen applications from abroad, and pass a law that anyone that comes across illegally is removed to country of origin irrespective of refugee status. 2. Rejoin the EU and take everything that comes with that, including the Euro and free movement of people if need be, and then ensure that we continue what we did before in removing using the Dublin agreement. 3. Start funding education in the countries that are the biggest issues, as well as tackling global inequality that pushed economic migrants towards Europe. Other solutions are just sticking plasters.

Badum tsccchhh...

But that was for 300 people only, and cost £600m. For 30k people that would cost £60bn.

In which case we're not gaining anything at all, just continue as we are now.

There are - not as many as the m n, but they are there - so where do they go?