Farmer Saint

Better thought out and makes more sense than his usual posts TBF.

She is an utter piece of shit.

Read about due legal process and then come back. You really don't help the view that all right wingers are knuckle-dragging Neanderthals.

Walked past him 3 times in the last year outside Westminster. Issue with meetings being on a Wednesday I guess.

Or flid. That was a big one in late 80's/early 90's.

They'd be far more accepting of this if we were still in the EU. Thank God Reform have someone at the helm that will help to build relations with the...oh hang on.

Ninny.

Berk.

We could all coordinate and put him on ignore. That way he can have his say without being quietened (the chance would be a fine thing) by us, but we don't have to see his confused postings.

And you wonder why people get annoyed at you!

1. But are you sending 40k people out there a year, and where are they going to be housed? For instance Rwanda had one hotel, and for 300 people was going to cost £600m without having to build more areas to house people. And if you're elongating the amount of time that number is going to grow, and it won't make a difference to the number of people accepted. How much are you willing to spend on this? Are you willing to spend the £2m per person for 40k per year (£80bn per year)? Wouldn't a small amount of this money invested in better technology and quicker handling of processing be a better deterrent? 2. But what was the actual reason they shut the border? Considering they had just agreed in June 2026 to a raft of new laws, are they already rowing back on those as not strong enough? Why shut the border just to Spain and not to all countries? What is the reason for shutting that border? I know you've said it's the last questions you'll respond to on this, probably because the above aren't proper answers and you know I'll be trying to get some actual details put of you.

Why is being processed in Rwanda or a 3rd country different to being processed in an army barracks in Crowborough that they aren't allowed to leave? Why is what Italy have done a good thing, and what do they hope to achieve from it? You've mentioned both multiple times so you must have some compelling reasons.

The issue is not the political leanings of who is posting, the issue is who is posting. For instance, not sure outside of Soggy anyone that has had too much of an issue with @iansums. I think what you'll find is that a number of posters on here do not suffer fools gladly, and unfortunately too many of those posters fall under that banner. Not sure us centrists asking you to answer questions or justify your posts is really quietening dissent, do you? Quite the opposite in fact, we're giving you the chance to state your point. The issue is you fuck it up every time.

So Rwanda was for 300 people - what would you do with the other 40k? We had something that worked. We decided to get rid of it. That's what we need back. Just out of interest, why is being processed in Rwanda different to being processed in an army barracks in Crowborough that they aren't allowed to leave?

So you want the definition of what is considered a refugee to be changed to what? Why is what Italy have done a good thing, and what do they hope to achieve from it?

Different post he was responding to. Either way didn't realise you right wingers were such snowflakes.

One of the companies I was working with said they saw a 9% increase in productivity just from having Copilot on calls to take and send out meeting notes and tasks. Ridiculous numbers considering the investment. God knows what would happen if it was used properly.

Watch out for a spate of broken arms.

Why - how's that helping? Also, are you going to answer my question from yesterday? I answered yours.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c62vl925dqdo Interesting - as some of us here have said, showing the dangers of Social Media, especially on the uneducated.

You have in the past, so not sure why you're pulling the high and mighty card now. I don't think I'm getting personal anyway. It's a bit odd your criticising the EU for not being able to change International Law, like it is that easy, especially when talking about what tends to be humanitarian crises. In addition to this because you haven't heard about it you automatically think they haven't tried hard enough - another very strange assumption. What kind of treaties are you proposing the EU put forward?

I don't think any of us have any knowledge or whether they do or don't, as unless laws are put through (and International Law's are notoriously difficult to change) we wouldn't hear about it. You seem to have a very odd understanding of how the world works - a bit like a child.

Absolutely no idea. I'm not party to those discussions.

The Dublin agreement was a deterrent. The reason not many people went back under it was because people didn't come over illegally then, because of the deterrent. Look at the numbers up to 2018.

I think taxes should be lowered for low and medium earners you gimp. Stop making stuff up.