Farmer Saint

I'll repeat: Why won't you report her? You've already said you don't believe her benefits claim for mental health and she's gaming the system, so why won't you do the right thing? Simple question.

Nope, we both know that I asked you for her details because it might push you to do the right thing. Why won't you report her? You've already said you don't believe her benefits claim for mental health and she's gaming the system, so why won't you do the right thing? Simple question.

No, I wanted you to report her, and you wouldn't, even though you bad-mouthed her and everyone else who claims benefits for bogus reasons. I then said I would, and you offered up her details to my email address. I then provided you one and you chickened out, like you do when thinking of reporting her. Morally devoid cunts like yourself are the reason this country is a fucking dive. Well done you 👏 Remember when you said it would be a breach of GDPR? Fucking stupid goon.

If she wasn't white I bet you'd report her.

How's about you get some ethics, grow some balls, and report someone for doing something very illegal? People like you are why paedophiles stay on the street. "Oh, he's just a weirdo". People in the forces are meant to have morals, so what the fuck happened to you? Fucking enablers.

Why don't you report her, you morally corrupt wimp?

Ah, so this is your missus mate who you're scared of reporting for benefits fraud. https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/entertainment/celebrity/daniella-westbrook-homeless-benefits-pals-12298578

Fellows is pacey, Edozie is tricky. No space in behind as Watford are sitting back.

I agree, I don't hold many grudges, but I do with those goggle-eyed cunts.

But Essex police say they didn't advise any candidate not to attend.

He wouldn't lie, would he?

Which is why we don't treat you the same way we do the others.

Well, considering immigration was down 85% over the last year and a half, very little I would expect.

But you have to have a structure to allow for people growth - declining populations are bad for economic growth. The issue is also the geography and demographics of those people, making the country more balanced would allow that to happen. It's easy to have infrastructure if it is well planned and not kicked down the road as Governments tend to do.

But that cost will only be passed onto the consumer. The issue where we are is actually not that we don't have enough water (and this is common for a lot of the UK), it's that it can't be treated quick enough to satisfy demand. Additional reservoirs would help, but more treatment plants are really what is needed, and is a cheaper and quicker fix than desalination.

More good news on the economy. Strange silence from our resident economics experts. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cj62qry74q5wt

I think the issue is the huge amount of cost it takes to run these plants. Plus it'll taste of dead migrants.

Sounds like some posters on here.

Another striker I would say.

TBF, it's not a burner email account, and it's been active for 3 or so years, but anyway. You are indicating above that if I sent you my email address you would give me details to report them. Or did you mean something different?The point remains, why won't you report them yourself? You're enabling benefits cheats when you post about how they need to be stopped? Or, as we all suspect, you're lying and doing a SOG.

Eating me up, no, but I'm enjoying watching you squirm 😂😂😂

I'm calling you dishonest and having no morals and ethics because you won't report them yourself. You're missing the point and trying to rewrite history. All you need to do is apologise for not giving the details you promised and admit you're a liar, and I'll stop. Otherwise I will continue. That's what happens when you've spent the last few years piling on another poster for similar behaviours.

😂😂😂😂😂 Jesus, no wonder you got thrown out of the Navy if you're that dishonest. But as you said this is your Mrs' friend who you hold in distain for cheating benefits, but won't report for some reason. No morals, no ethics, but then of course "birds of a feather..."

1 - Number of benefits cheats details @AlexLaw76 said he'd provide if an email address was sent over. 0 - Number of benefits details received by said email address.

Will this be to replace GP appointments for mental health issues (unless referred by these centres for more serious conditions)? If so, freeing up more appointments can only be a good thing as long as the mental health provision doesn't drop in quality.