Dman

Twar was his name, The lad who’s never played the game, Claims Broja is poor, and Armstrong Shouldn’t score, We don’t want to hear his nonsense no more.

It can’t be. Mike Dean was tapping him up Yesterday, to join city.

Saints being shit keeps this place alive with never ending, repetitive debates. It’s boring on here when we’re winning.

As do I, which is how I know the traits. as I said, it wasn’t a dig and would explain why we clash as sometimes it feels like banging my head against a brick wall. apologies if you have taken offence.

The ball was there to put us 1-0 up. Unfortunately the man won’t admit that.

You seem unable to grasp reality and external factors. You don’t seem to understand anything that’s not in black and white on a laptop. it’s actually not a dig, it would explain a lot.

I was going to say the same, give me a chance where I’m running onto a through ball with half the goal gaping, than standing over a still ball, with all the pressures a penalty brings. There is a place for stats in the game, 100% but they’re not the be all and end all like Twar makes out. I can only assume he has some form of disorder which means he is unable to critically think.

xG, in this case, is utter crap mate. It doesn’t factor in the variables. Like keeper positioning and time in the ball. Significantly easier chance than Adams. Both were what you’d expect a premier league player to score, however.

The keeper didn’t even save it, he didn’t need to, it was never going in and was extremely lucky to hit the post, such was the spin on the ball after he scuffed it. So I don’t understand the relevance in this respect. AA had so Much space he even time to take a touch and drill It in the bottom corner past the keeper.

You specifically ignored Armstrong’s chance from your list of 3 big mistakes that cost us, which has started this mass debate. To me, that is because of 1 of 2 reasons. 1. Because you’ve been banging on about Armstrong for the past 2 weeks and don’t want to lose ground in your assault of Broja. 2. You’re just absolutely clueless when it comes to football other than reading %’s from a spreadsheet. Please provide any posts where I have said San Marino, Jankowiz or Pompey were class? I tell you what, don’t bother looking cos that’s a lie to try and deflect the argument and won’t find any. I cba to get into that debate again. Note you still haven’t acknowledged that Armstrong should have scored, despite demonstrating 2 other, harder, opportunities where scored 😂😂

The right call. Been fantastic for 18 month or so now, very much deserved. On current form, should be a shoe in for the WC squad based on his ability to play either side. Very unfortunate to play at a time where England are blessed with RB’s who are world class. Similar to Bridge being behind Cole.

This same line comes out every time you’re losing a debate. There’s a thread dedicated to your utter nonsense pal.. I think that says a lot.

Yep, happy to hold my hands up and admit I was wrong in that respect. We signed a top striker, who was better than anyone expected who’s pushed us up the league.

Wtf are you rambling on about now?

You’re trying to justify why he shouldn’t have scored by showing examples of 2 similar chances that were errr…. scored? what was Djenepo XG for his goal in that game, a similar opportunity to Armstrong, another goal.

Watch it back. AA was running on the the ball, it was perfectly weighted. Any striker worth their salt puts that away 8 or 9 times out of 10. AA being off balance and the ball getting stuck under his feet is an indication of his ability, not the difficultly of the chance. As for Twar, he thinks he knows best constantly. Never willing to admit he’s wrong. He made a ridiculous statement about Adam Armstrong’s ‘ceiling’ and has been scrambling weekly to try and justify it. It’s got to the point where it’s almost laughable.

Those two chances aren’t even remotely similar. 1. look at the keepers position. Very good from Ramsdale, poor from the city keeper. 2. look at the defenders around Ings and sliding towards the back post, which is where he’d have to hit the ball to score. Unless you’ve got the ability to whip it near post (very hard finish). 3. Ings you’d need to take a touch bend in the corner. Armstrong was running onto the ball and could easily put his foot through it. Poor argument to try and justify your weak argument.

I wonder what the XG was of that attempt.

Should he have scored that, yes or no?

Hang on, just to get this correct. You do not think that this (photo below, just as he was about the strike the ball is a “should be scoring chance?” LMFAO. They don’t get any easier.

Does it actually matter. Anyone who has played from tyro - the champions league would be able to tell you that Armstrong’s chance was a sitter which he should be scoring. That’s ultimately what this argument has come from. if you honestly believe that his attempt was simply unlucky, because it hit the post, that says a lot about your knowledge of football. Or agenda…

I wouldn’t go that far, personally. To be fair he seems a little rash and I think we could probably do with a ready made starter. Him and salisu would worry me as both lack that experience. I do think, with time, he certainly could improve though. He’s a bit of a beast. His header (off the bar) against Chelsea was fantastic. I’d like to see him replace Salisu (hopefully the summer after next), with a bit of a leader brought in this summer. Worell from forest looks like he could fit that bill.

How many Torino, São Paulo, or Bologna games did you watch? My guess is 0.

I don’t think we’ve seen anywhere near enough of Lyanco to come to that conclusion.

Are we just ignoring his goal against West Ham, which was 5 games ago? And besides that, he was arguably MOTM against United, which was 2 games before that and scored against totenham which was the game before United. So yes, it’s fair to say he’s been ‘off form’ for 4 games and not ‘Months’… he’s been inconsistent, which is to be expected of a 20 year old playing his first season the the premier league for a lower mid table team.