Sir Ralph

All fair points. Not of the responses to your post have actually successfully challenged what you said, in fact I don’t know what the objective of the the responses are. Multiple mocking responses don’t make what you’ve said incorrect because it’s all factually correct and most rationale people acknowledge and understand that.

Don’t be rationale - the fa aren’t following precedents they have already set. They are making this up as they go along

Again this is within the rules. Are. You equally disgusted that Labour did the same?

What Rayner is saying is we don’t like these big donors as they are donating to other parties. Can’t imagine big business donating much to the Labour Party.

I don’t think there is an issue with accepting either donation as long as it is within the law. It’s at each parties own discretion regarding the optics of it

Hi please see my previous post Look up David Neal and the Welsh Labour campaign. Accepted multiple donations, were called out on it. And didn’t return the £ up David Neal and the Welsh Labour campaign. Accepted multiple donations, were called out on it. And didn’t return the £ as I understand it

I agree Defensively a bit short but he gives a lot going forward and from set pieces

I’ve responded on the returned donations. Your argument about the amount is very weak. It’s the principle. Did they accept donations and not return them from convicted criminals in the same manner you have criticised reform? It’s a simple yes or no

Not sure whether they did but if they did fair enough. They didn’t return all donations from other criminals though. Look up David Neal and the Welsh Labour campaign. Accepted multiple donations, were called out on it. And didn’t return the £ as I understand it

I looked nothing there. So the answer to whether you raised this issue with convicted Labour donors is “no” = double standards. I didn’t find a lot of unanswered questions though. How about this, I’ll give you another chance….Whilst it isn’t illegal to take donations from people with convictions do you ageee that Labour are no better than reform in this respect as they have recieved donations from criminals? The questions were in the message - you don’t even need a search function

They will come down unnecessarily hard. They will take the punishment out of all context. Even if they do what a motivation to get promoted

What did I cut and paste?

Happy for you to point me to that post being the balanced and non partisan poster I’m sure you are. I’ve no doubt you can back up your statement with the requisite evidence. I noticed you didn’t answer the questions yet (again)

If the wallies at the fa give him a 6 month ban I don’t think we will sack him. If he is banned is he not allowed any contact with the club during that period at all?

For the directly comparable fixtures for last season we are plus eight points compared to last season

Best signing up front since lambert and pelle

Not harborne though. Did you post on here about shere sattars convictions and the therefore the unacceptable nature of his donations? Also is this acceptance of these donations illegal?

This was a period in time when lots of good young players left because we weren’t providing comparable contract offers to other clubs.

Straight red that. Ungentlemanly conduct

But of a question as to why we didn’t give him a new contract and loan him - aware that is subject to the player agreeing

Fair enough

I wonder whether the bad press will hit the donations. I’m not advocating that but I think it may

You can’t get sacked there that the great thing

Dealing in facts - which crimes has he been convicted of. If he hasn’t he isn’t a criminal - great news that people are donating to these parties. Light at the end of the tunnel in Europe

When I was younger I worked there for a year that was enough for me