Sir Ralph

No that Starmer picture was more amusing and I fully agree with GM along with many British people. Starmer is an embarrassment and has done huge damage to US relations. Too busy worrying about how his nutty back benchers will react and sections of Labour voters who inexplicably support a murderous regime to care about the impact of his pathetic decisions on the mainstream British voter. If people think losing the support of our most important ally to protect a murderous anti-western regime, they are frankly wrong. Bloke is a Donkey.

So a “Hope Not Hate” poll reported in the Daily Mirror (both politically biased). HNH are a deluded bunch of people who by having an empathetic name think that they are justified in shouting down anyone who disagrees with them, including many mainstream views, as being right wing. I’d have more faith in North Korean state media. Absolute Waste of time journalism. Come back with proper sources not mad leftie media journalism.

I profusely apologise - I meant “progressive” liberal British man 😂

Thanks, yes I was aware. CB Fry’s post was unnecessary, hence my twist on it.

100% agree with your assessment of Starmer. Weak and inspiring. Not a real leader that our forces want to get behind. Some people might suggest that’s the profile of a “progressive” British liberal man.

😂

In fact you repeatedly abusing people without making your own independent points makes you look rather limited.

If there are two teams we can chase down realistically I fancy our chances. If it’s only one less so. Hull are the ones we need to get dragged in

Hull have Ipswich, Wrexham and Millwall in the next few games. If they don’t win any of those, that opens up an opportunity for us

You haven’t found the ability to produce a single productive post rather than attempt to attack anyone on the opposite side of the political spectrum to you. I would recommend engaging with the topic at hand

.

And some poorly informed individuals in this country agree with his world view too. What sort of “leader” thinks we should get rid of our nuclear weapons. Maybe after his Groton and Denton success he’s got a taste for it and fancies his chances at being the replacement ayatollah for the Islamic Republic 😂

I agree but my point is that the instability maybe lessened if the population wants change anyway, rather than resisting the change.

What a fanny....is he vying for the role of the new Leader of the Islamic Republic. If this wally is allowed anywhere near Government, we are properly, properly screwed. Meanwhile Zack Polanski, leader of the Greens, dubbed the attack 'illegal' and 'unprovoked'. He wrote: 'This is an illegal, unprovoked and brutal attack that shows once again that the USA and Israel are rogue states. 'The UK must end our cosy relationship with the USA and our ongoing support for Israel.'

The reasons for removing saddam were weapons of mass destruction and I don’t recall there being uprising against him in advance. The Iranian population seems ready to get rid of the current regime and this is one of the reasons for removing them.

Im sure there are some that want the regime to stay but based on the uprisings and the subsequent killings it appears that most people want the government to go. Whilst theoretically regime change by the population would be ideal that’s not realistic. The only way this happens is US / Israeli involvement which is what is happening. I’d be surprised if they didn’t need military on foot achieve the objective though. The revolutionary guard ain’t going to go easily I imagine. If the regime fails I suspect they won’t be the most popular fellows so they have a lot to lose. Whilst regime change hasn’t been successful elsewhere, the context of some of that interference is different. In this case it appears that the majority of the population want change. I can see the difference with Iran but time will tell

As a westerner, I will be glad if this actions works out and the Iranian government is removed from power. Most Iranians will also be glad, even if you were correct that the US was solely acting in its own interests (which I don’t agree is the case). Thats the funny thing, I suspect most Iranians would disagree with the statement you made above ironically and they are the ones most impacted! The US and Israelis don’t appear to have motive for targeting the civilian population anyway it’s the government they want to remove. The want the population to rise up against the government so killing the same people would be a bit of a bad idea Unfortunately with these types of military actions there are casualties which shouldn’t be diminished but there is a greater good that will be achieved if the military action is successful. As a westerner I’m sure you’re not saying that the military action and removal of the Iranian government is a bad thing in the round

https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/798031/can-you-really-think-your-boobs-bigger/ Just this…..

I think that’s what the Greens are - those on the left of the Labour Party and some well beyond that. I question their experience in anything remotely complex or significant. I don’t think many leading companies would be looking to employ them, put it that way. She does have four greyhounds though. Polanski up to his old tricks again in this photo 🤣

This one makes me shudder….evacuate The Polanski Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?

12% of voters observed were impacted by this. 37,000 voters -12% is 4,440 votes enough to change the outcome. I’m telling you that this type of family / community based block voting occurs and is a strategy. We should be concerned about it. If you ask political consultants they will tell you this will influence May elections resulting in lots of fringe / independents getting into power some of whom probably don’t have the wider community interest at heart

Why would a non political not for profit charity organisation raise these issues if they didn’t occur? What happens if there is truth in the allegations - is there a rerun? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5yqpr28jrwo

You can question any theory, religious concept or political view without being shouted down for being xy or z. It completely misses the point and is very 2020 (in fact it quashes debate and deflects). One of the reasons Brexit happened was because the political elite ignored people’s concerns and labelled them. Those same people that bemoan Brexit (I didn’t vote for it) are repeating the same mistake and it will play out again at the next election. It will likely result in an election result that those same people will again bemoan.

It is getting worse in some areas, mainly more urban areas and it’s very dangerous. One theory is that some people could get elected through block voting by, put it this way, having policies which are less publicly available. If you have whole families being told to vote by certain leaders then that’s not democracy. Again if posters on here don’t think that happens in some areas it’s extremely naive. Whichever party you vote for people need to be aware of it as a possibility as most people don’t want it