Sir Ralph
Subscribed Users-
Posts
1,583 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Sir Ralph
-
Bragg is a class footballer. Reads the game very well. His positioning and movement is excellent. Never rushed. Passing accuracy is top. In my humble opinion he will be a class player.
-
Starting to feel like we have a team again. Ever since we went to a back 4 with a back man up top we’ve improved. The players seem to have more confidence and fight. With Peretz, Bree, THB and Downes all playing well we have a strong base of a team and we seem to have kicked out the errors in the main. Thoroughly enjoyable day out. This is why we watch football. Now looking forward to the end of what could be an exciting season.
-
That’s fine. Well they definitely use a cross section so I’ll start quoting them (I’m sure you understand the point I’m making by saying this). If we really quoting Hope not Hate on here then to bludgeon Reform voters we might as well quote Palestine Action in relation to its “facts” about the war in Gaza
-
Thats fine - I’ll start quoting Daily Mail polls from now on and expect everyone to accept the outcomes. Assume you will accept their results?
-
You want to play games on this but there is something called truth. I’m allowed to call a leftist view out if it isn’t actually reflective of the people it says it’s it is alledgedly reflecting. “Hope Not Hate” has a leftist / socialist agenda. Are you telling me (1) it doesn’t or (2) their views aren’t distorted by their political agenda. if not my point stands and is relevant
-
Israels no 1, Israel’s no 1. Perez top draw
-
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
Sir Ralph replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
Well he shouldn’t if he did. No need to reciprocate the violence though. A piano wire is very specific. -
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
Sir Ralph replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
No need for the aggression and getting personal. Starmer is an embarrassment and has done huge damage to US relations. Too busy worrying about how his back benchers will react and sections of his voters who inexplicably support a murderous regime to care about the impact of his poor decisions on the mainstream British voter. If people think losing the support of our most important ally to protect a murderous anti-western regime, then we have a big problem. Not fit for office in my opinion. -
So a “Hope Not Hate” poll reported in the Daily Mirror (both politically biased). HNH are a deluded bunch of people who by having an empathetic name think that they are justified in shouting down anyone who disagrees with them, including many mainstream views, as being right wing. I’d have more faith in North Korean state media. Absolute Waste of time journalism. Come back with proper sources not mad leftie media journalism.
-
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
Sir Ralph replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
I profusely apologise - I meant “progressive” liberal British man 😂 -
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
Sir Ralph replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
Thanks, yes I was aware. CB Fry’s post was unnecessary, hence my twist on it. -
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
Sir Ralph replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
100% agree with your assessment of Starmer. Weak and inspiring. Not a real leader that our forces want to get behind. Some people might suggest that’s the profile of a “progressive” British liberal man. -
😂
-
-
In fact you repeatedly abusing people without making your own independent points makes you look rather limited.
-
If there are two teams we can chase down realistically I fancy our chances. If it’s only one less so. Hull are the ones we need to get dragged in
-
Hull have Ipswich, Wrexham and Millwall in the next few games. If they don’t win any of those, that opens up an opportunity for us
-
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
Sir Ralph replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
You haven’t found the ability to produce a single productive post rather than attempt to attack anyone on the opposite side of the political spectrum to you. I would recommend engaging with the topic at hand -
And some poorly informed individuals in this country agree with his world view too. What sort of “leader” thinks we should get rid of our nuclear weapons. Maybe after his Groton and Denton success he’s got a taste for it and fancies his chances at being the replacement ayatollah for the Islamic Republic 😂
-
I agree but my point is that the instability maybe lessened if the population wants change anyway, rather than resisting the change.
-
What a fanny....is he vying for the role of the new Leader of the Islamic Republic. If this wally is allowed anywhere near Government, we are properly, properly screwed. Meanwhile Zack Polanski, leader of the Greens, dubbed the attack 'illegal' and 'unprovoked'. He wrote: 'This is an illegal, unprovoked and brutal attack that shows once again that the USA and Israel are rogue states. 'The UK must end our cosy relationship with the USA and our ongoing support for Israel.'
-
The reasons for removing saddam were weapons of mass destruction and I don’t recall there being uprising against him in advance. The Iranian population seems ready to get rid of the current regime and this is one of the reasons for removing them.
-
Im sure there are some that want the regime to stay but based on the uprisings and the subsequent killings it appears that most people want the government to go. Whilst theoretically regime change by the population would be ideal that’s not realistic. The only way this happens is US / Israeli involvement which is what is happening. I’d be surprised if they didn’t need military on foot achieve the objective though. The revolutionary guard ain’t going to go easily I imagine. If the regime fails I suspect they won’t be the most popular fellows so they have a lot to lose. Whilst regime change hasn’t been successful elsewhere, the context of some of that interference is different. In this case it appears that the majority of the population want change. I can see the difference with Iran but time will tell
-
As a westerner, I will be glad if this actions works out and the Iranian government is removed from power. Most Iranians will also be glad, even if you were correct that the US was solely acting in its own interests (which I don’t agree is the case). Thats the funny thing, I suspect most Iranians would disagree with the statement you made above ironically and they are the ones most impacted! The US and Israelis don’t appear to have motive for targeting the civilian population anyway it’s the government they want to remove. The want the population to rise up against the government so killing the same people would be a bit of a bad idea Unfortunately with these types of military actions there are casualties which shouldn’t be diminished but there is a greater good that will be achieved if the military action is successful. As a westerner I’m sure you’re not saying that the military action and removal of the Iranian government is a bad thing in the round
