Jump to content

Sir Ralph

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    1,055
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Sir Ralph

  1. Must be a good policy then!
  2. I think you’re being slightly sensitive. I’m being respectful when saying this but maybe you spend your time in an environment which is more sensitive in respect of these matters. People are frustrated with institutions such as SFC which over prioritise certain groups and ask them to represent the fans. It’s fine for certain groups to represent fans but it should be on a proportionate basis. Some of the comments may not be to your liking but to say that some of the reading is troubling is wide of the mark, in my opinion.
  3. The point is that Board is not representative of the fan base. The Club have decided in their wisdom to obtain advice from a number of people who proportionately don’t reflect our fans.
  4. 100% agree with you. A coalition of centrists. Unfortunately unlikely to happen
  5. I agree they are doing more than the Tories. Let’s not hold our breath though. The backbench loonies are now on this revolt this lunchtime. Trying to get themselves voted out again!
  6. Yes I have, particularly by you. It’s been a privilege learning so much from you😂
  7. That was a matter of fact with quotes as to why the guy is leaving. The same article is covered in a number of business publications. There are levels of bias and predetermination - this is at the most extreme end possible. The group has been put together for a sole purpose. That’s why is has no value
  8. Not biased in their predetermined outcome whatsoever. Absolutely valueless evidence. wealth.
  9. Gary Stevenson don’t make me laugh. A list of “who are they?” In the business world! Might as well get fat Joe down the pub to write this. This shows your level of understanding. Goodbye https://patrioticmillionaires.uk/who-we-are
  10. https://moneyweek.com/personal-finance/tax/where-rich-relocate-to When this backs up your own personal experience it’s difficult not to think this is happening.
  11. That hurts coming from somebody who is clearly incredibly experienced in these matters. It cuts deep. They are big words but which part of what is said is “shit”?
  12. Yes I do think people have and will leave. Stop deflecting. This page is about the Labour Party. Not the Tories who put party before people and I wasn’t a fan off, particularly in the latter years. I didn’t vote for brexit either. The anti business policies of the Labour Party are a choice. They need to stop blaming everyone else and they are now accountable for their decisions.
  13. I didn’t say the Tories did a good job (at the end they were a mess) but they didn’t scare business like the current lot. That is not a good thing, including for the public sector which relies on a vibrant private sector to be funded
  14. Who pays a lot of taxes and I imagine one way or another supports you indirectly. As I said before careful what you wish for. With these guys leaving the budget deficit won’t be addressed through tax cuts by the next government , it will be welfare and public sector cuts (people’s jobs).
  15. What a dumb comment. If you think this is all shits and giggles it’s not. this is the type of guy funding the public sector with large tax payments. When the next government gets in and there is a budget deficit as a result I know what will be targeted and it won’t be more taxes so be careful what you wish for The point is about the business environment being created. In the long run he wants to leave because he is young and thinks opportunities are better elsewhere.
  16. All rather sad https://www.gulf-insider.com/britains-richest-young-entrepreneur-quits-uk/
  17. Brilliant - so no answer to anything. This is a complete cop out. It’s getting ridiculous now. I’ve given you the chance to call me out and show what a pleb I am but you can’t even do that. The question about Starmer therefore remains unanswered as there isn’t a reasonable response to it
  18. Live in London and the South East. Already have the highest cost of living in the country. Aspired to do the right thing. We are after you. The message is don’t aspire or succeed cause we will just take it off you, one way or another to pay for our failure #the socialist way https://www.lbc.co.uk/article/mansion-tax-risks-punishing-homeowners-opinion-5HjdMj5_2/ https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/rachel-reeves-london-homes-property-uturn-income-tax-manifesto-b1258149.html
  19. Point where I have not answered a question. You don’t want to answer this because nobody has so far.
  20. You still haven’t answered why Starmers facts about the inefficiency of the public sector are incorrect. Any thoughts on why those government figures are incorrect yet? We have a different view I agree but saying the socialist left are not influencing the Labour Party is completely wrong. You need welfare I agree but it’s gone too far. encouraging people to be reliant on benefits and paying people to have more children than they responsibly have (when the tax payers making the tax contributions for this can’t sometime afford the same the same number of children) isn’t the way a decent society operates. I agree with the cabinet on the reductions they proposed so even they know it needs to happen https://www.gov.uk/government/news/biggest-shake-up-to-welfare-system-in-a-generation-to-get-britain-working The rest of my post is correct. Celebrating shiteness. To be fair this is a good policy shift which the Tories didn’t introduce and could have. Well done to the government on this https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c231x8rj1zpo
  21. Exactly we all know it and it’s been played out before over the welfare bill. This is one of the reasons why they can’t come up with a coherent budget, placating the socialist left of their party. I thought they had maybe got rid of that mad lot but they were hiding. I’ll look forward to some of the gang trying to now argue that the left wing element of the Labour Party haven’t called the shots on the previous budget (and therefore this one). Some people think the Goverment has “saved the day” by getting less shite growth forecasts than expected which has meant the budget deficit they have helped to create is just not as terrible as previously expected. One of the main reasons for the budget deficit is due to the downgrade in productivity of business (nothing to do with the previous budget at all!!). They are the types of people that, if Saints were expected to finish 24th this season, might say it’s a success finishing 23rd. You don’t deserve congratulations for getting into a less (but nonetheless) shite position that you had helped create. 😂
  22. So you think it is a u-turn?
  23. I agree that the Johnson and Truss governments (latter in particular) had their bad moments. Truss was terrible for a very short period, due to the speed of her policies changes, before she got the push. Most of them got pushed when they had messed up. These lot have acheived 1.5 years of consistent rubbish. They are record breakers in the crap olympics. I would like Streeting to be PM but unfortunately a significant portion of his party is socialist so his hands would be tied.
  24. You know things are getting desperate when the “gang” are making a point that it’s a success that the government haven’t publicly u-turned on a matter within the budget. They must be sat in No 10 patting themselves on the back for not fing up publicly. Sets a new low bar for measuring success! Who is worse Sport Republic or this Government?
×
×
  • Create New...