Sir Ralph

Will Still is thriving at Lens even though they keep selling players | Ligue 1 | The Guardian Lens president wants Will Still to remain at the club - Get French Football News I read quite a bit about him before this season and there were a lot of positives being said. Seems though he has continued it this season in difficult circumstances. Not sure what the objection would be based on his track record so far, other than he hasnt managed in England (neither had Poch or Koeman). It needs something a bit more radical to shake the stale feeling of the club. I would like Rohl too.

What happens if Rusk turns this team around before the end of the season - would you keep him next year? I think he installed some guts into the team in the 2 games he had in charge.

Guy was on a hiding to nothing. Feel sorry for him.

Societally, clapping is used to show approval, appreciation or excitement. I think that answers the question. It would be a better use of time to clap paint drying because it’s doing something productive. its rewarding incompetency, which is historically shown to be folly.

I left on 80 got a train straight back. I didnt see the disallowed goal was in the concourse. My 8 year old said to me today that the best bit about yesterday was half time. Dibling's lack of effort was shameful.

The fans should have been on their backs much earlier in the game. The lack of effort was completely unacceptable, particularly in the first half. I’m surprised anyone was there at the end anyway let alone thought it was appropriate to clap them (quite unbelievable).

I think neither the WLM or BLM banners are helpful. Can you answer my question though? I’m finding it really difficult that there appears to be no explanation? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Lots of deflecting and speculation. No facts. It’s interesting

This doesnt surprise me - whenever the wokerati (your words) are confronted with direct questions they deflect. Again the question......

You havent explained it and wont waste your time because the only answer is the use of the word 'foreign'. Sorry you cant make lots of comments about these people being extreme racists and then not justify your position on why their banner is so terrible.

What wording in the banner is discriminatory please? Also I dont think the establishment of Rangers are held in high regard. The other actions by the fans in relation to missiles, etc clearly cant be condoned but they have been charged for the banner. Again, the question please?

.

Lots of speculation behind the meaning of what they may possibly be potentially saying. However, I deal in facts and the point is that the words aren't discriminatory and UEFA have clearly overstretched themselves cause it doesnt fit with their agenda. A lot of speculation in these posts but no real response which addressed the original question. If the only answer is that they used the word 'foreign' thats frankly embarrassing and reinforces the purpose of the banner.

Pretty tenuous if thats what they are saying. If that is the case it probably shows that UEFA is woke, hence their objection to the banner.

We have 9 points - could be none!

So Rangers fans have a banner which says "Keep woke foreign ideologies out - defend Europe." But UEFA says that the banner is discriminatory and racist - how exactly? How is the banner discriminatory? Uefa charges Rangers over 'shameful' anti-woke banner - BBC Sport