-
Posts
14,266 -
Joined
Everything posted by bridge too far
-
For those with company law knowledge
bridge too far replied to hughieslastminutegoal's topic in The Saints
And I think, to add to WC's explanation, that the Football League don't issue a certificate to play in the League until the CVA has been agreed? -
What's the job, Ponty? Mr TF would LURV to work at your place
-
For those with company law knowledge
bridge too far replied to hughieslastminutegoal's topic in The Saints
Company Voluntary Arrangements -
How much does it cost to run the floodlights at SMS?
bridge too far replied to Window Cleaner's topic in The Saints
Not that you can get to DIRECTly. -
How much does it cost to run the floodlights at SMS?
bridge too far replied to Window Cleaner's topic in The Saints
Just popped back to to say bye bye before I drive off in my Proton :smt039 -
Fanimal - what does that phrase shown next to your icon mean :confused: Looks a tad rude to me :oops:
-
How much does it cost to run the floodlights at SMS?
bridge too far replied to Window Cleaner's topic in The Saints
That's it! You're all too clever for me and I'm a girlie so I don't understand electricity I'm switching to another thread. -
How much does it cost to run the floodlights at SMS?
bridge too far replied to Window Cleaner's topic in The Saints
I'm still struggling to get 'Van der Graaff generator' into this topic -
What's with the strange user names?
bridge too far replied to bridge too far's topic in The Muppet Show
Oh so it's not a real sinister conspiracy then Seriously, thanks for clearing that up, Steve. No longer will I have to try to work out if the names are anagrams. -
I've notice lately that all our new members have really weird user names. For example, today's newby: enlaclepe But all the people actually visiting the site have normal(ish) u/names. :confused:
-
Lowe's biggest mistake(s)? 1. Not keeping the lovely NP 2. Being born
-
It's going to be cold tonight too. I reckon high 12s.
-
So that's why the cheeky chappie's legged it then
-
Will they send that information out in a chain letter?
-
Was it the Funeral March?
-
I couldn't keep a deadPAN face when I read that article
-
I bet he was a WEE bit embarrassed, eh
-
But WC surely it's all about being able to service those debts however big or small they might be. Isn't this what we're failing to do, and will continue to fail to do for the foreseeable future? MU can service their debts ATM I think.
-
But he left Wycombe to do his A Levels, I thought
-
For those with company law knowledge
bridge too far replied to hughieslastminutegoal's topic in The Saints
We could rent from Eastleigh FC, surely? That holds a couple of thousand, I would have thought. I'm laughing through my tears -
Lowe running Saints like a business- a misconception
bridge too far replied to cambsaint's topic in The Saints
Aviva is struggling on the LSE these days - maybe we're a toxic debt -
Lowe running Saints like a business- a misconception
bridge too far replied to cambsaint's topic in The Saints
What a shame you didn't read my post properly. I love it when people jump to conclusions Others had mentioned Leeds council as well and Coventry council - I was merely pointing out the possible flaw in the idea that SCC would buy SMS. Idea - not suggestion - see the difference? I was also pointing out the downside of a private owner renting SMS back to the club. -
For those with company law knowledge
bridge too far replied to hughieslastminutegoal's topic in The Saints
The link I'm about to show is to do with construction, not football clubs but I wonder if what has been done here could be done with SLH? The contracting division has gone into administration but the housebuilding and property development bit hasn't. I guess it all depends on the way the various companies are structured. http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/mid/7693325.stm -
Lowe running Saints like a business- a misconception
bridge too far replied to cambsaint's topic in The Saints
And in these heady financial climes, who / what is going to fork out whatever Aviva want to sell the mortgage on for (because that's what would have to happen in effect)? Would the City be happy for the Council to spend taxpayers' money in that way? I doubt it. And a private investor would want a healthy return on their outlay and that could mean the club paying more in rent than it currently pays for the mortgage, surely?