aintforever

All that the killing has done is ensure that there will be much more in the future. It's the same old cycle just on a bigger scale and it will just carry on as before, unless there is some sort of roadmap to a two state solution.

He must be tired bless him, he actually did some work on Thursday. Buch of lazy cunts all of them.

There was some Police chief on the radio the other day saying that exact thing, basically echoing what Alexis Jay, the person who carried out the first review, said. The short-comings that led to what went on have been identified and the police have already made changes, we just need to get on and implement the findings.

They looked fine to me.

When we attacked Smallbone just jogged about, when we were defending he just jogged about. The cunt was just a passenger.

Manager fucked us with the subs.

Every sub he’s made has made us worse.

What is the point of Smallbone?

Fantastic display so far, Sully is a revelation.

Too much Death Metal.

Of course the timing is down to the change in President but it could be more down to Biden wanting to get it sorted before he left or Netanyahu wanting to suck up to the next President than Trump's negotiating skills. It's obviously good news so credit to Trump if it is his doing - we will have to wait and see how well he gets on with delivering a lasting peace and two state solution now.

That's why I'm not bothered about the rise of Reform. Farage is a cunt but at least they support PR. As it currently stands both Labour and the Tories are about as popular as anal polyps so hopefully if enough Lib Dems and Reform MPs get elected next time around we might actually get some progress.

Oh please, don't be such a drama queen. She was clearly laughing at the idea that men don't have the opportunity to raise issues, not the issues themselves. If you have to pretend to be outraged at least get your facts right.

Because there has already been one and they think another would be a waste of time and money which would be better off spent implementing the findings of the last one?

What exactly was censored? I remember reading all sorts about the possible side-effects, from the government, MSM and online.

I was handed a little leaflet explaining the risks of certain side effects when I had my first jab. From what I remember they were widely publicised at the time as well, certainly remember reading about them.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0ewe4p9128o “Climate change has made the grasses and shrubs that are fuelling the Los Angeles fires more vulnerable to burning, scientists say. Rapid swings between dry and wet conditions in the region in recent years have created a massive amount of tinder-dry vegetation that is ready to ignite. Decades of drought in California were followed by extremely heavy rainfall for two years in 2022 and 2023, but that then flipped again to very dry conditions the in autumn and winter of 2024. Scientists say in a new study, external that climate change has boosted what they call these "whiplash" conditions globally by 31-66% since the middle of the 20th Century. The wildfires have spread across parts of the Los Angeles area, leading to at least five deaths, burning down hundreds of buildings, and prompting evacuation orders for more than 179,000 people. "This whiplash sequence in California has increased fire risk twofold," said lead author Daniel Swain from UCLA. "First, by greatly increasing the growth of flammable grass and brush in the months leading up to fire season, and then by drying it out to exceptionally high levels with the extreme dryness and warmth that followed." The researchers say that with every degree of warming the atmosphere is able to evaporate, absorb and release 7% more water. This "expanding atmospheric sponge" as the scientists term it, not only leads to flooding when things are wetter, but it pulls extra moisture out of the plants and soils when the drier conditions set in.”

We were streamed at my school so I wouldn't have got near fuck-wits like you.

Bless. Struggle with science at school did we?

I think they never implemented any of the 20 recommendations and also turned down a public inquiry.

But Trump did suggest drinking bleach, we all watched it. No journalism is free from bias but the BBC is as good as you will find. I remember an old uni mate of mine who worked there explaining all the checks they have to go through before publishing a story compared to the tabloids etc.

It’s not that they don’t care about child abuse, just that the motivation behind the tweets is just political dog whistling. Looks to me like finally implementing the findings of the inquiries that have taken place should be the priority now.

It’s not whataboutery, just using two examples to highlight certain people’s agendas. If people want an inquiry because the genuinely care about child abuse and sex crimes that’s fine, I don’t think that is the case here though.

I understand the differences with both cases but if it was mosques where kids were being abused and it was covered up to the highest level by the Muslim institutions you, the Daily Mail, Musk, Farage etc would be all over it.

Well if the same abuse had happened throughout the UK’s mosques and covered up to the highest level you would be all over it.