aintforever

You gave the impression that you thought we had nothing to do with the war crimes we are seeing, that’s what I thought was wrong. How much we are actually complicit doesn’t really matter to us, it’s how much the Arab world see us as being part of it that is important. Especially those who are prepared to blow themselves up on tube trains for their cause. When that much hatred festers there is inevitably some comeback.

Glad you agree with me then.

The whole idea that our government hasn’t supported Israel. Iran won’t be giving Russia drones for free, are you saying they don’t support them too?

I just hope the killing of innocent people stops, Israeli and Palestinian. 7/10 was awful but Israel just reaped what their sowed, there will never be peace until both sides have freedom.

Selling/providing, same result in the end.

That’s bollocks, we all remember Sunak saying “I hope you win”, it’s not hard to see though a few half arsed comment about civilians. https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/12/12/selling-weapons-israel-could-make-uk-complicit-war-crimes

Yep, with the support of our government. It’s naive to think there won’t be any consequences for us going forward.

It’s bewildering how neither the Republicans or Democrats can find anyone younger/less mental to represent them. Biden looks like a decent guy but at 81 he’s clearly not fit to be president, Trump is just so unsuitable for the job it’s scary. You would think if either side had someone younger and vaguely human they would win by a landslide. Weird place.

Here's a more recent survey carried out by Hypo/The Daily Mail:

What percentage are trans then, I don’t know? Does it really matter? Certainly no excuse for a joke about trans people when a grieving mother of a trans related murder victim was in the house.

He did answer it though, something about 99.9% wasn’t it?

I don’t think anyone has problems with people asking questions, it’s the inappropriate joking that’s the issue.

So he didn’t ask a question then

What question did he ask?

Luckily, you don’t need to spend billions on a navy to sink a Russian Missile Cruiser:

I just assumed it was Johnson. Either because Boris sounds like a name you would give a dog, or because he humps everything in sight. I’m sure our resident Gammon will fill you in.

Think Labour and the Lib Dems would be happier.

Yeah, because for starters it’s over 2000km away and we would have to go through half of Europe. Bit like what the mighty Russian Army would have to do.

Yet they couldn’t even take Kiev.

Politicians and the media will always lie, mislead and manipulate, it's making the leap from that to these bizarre conspiracy theories that is the crazy part.

MLT was my hero growing up, wether he was our best ever is debatable but he certainly was the most skilful and entertaining player I have seen in a Saints shirt. Probably the most naturally gifted player the premier league has seen. His views are as mad as a box of frogs though which is a shame. Everyone is entitled to their opinion but when someone in his position talks such nonsense in the media it can be dangerous.

In the current climate it does seem like a good idea to increase spending on the military. On the other hand though the much-feared Russian army couldn't even make it to Kiev without getting it's ass kicked so not sure they are much of a threat to us over here.

Looks like it worked. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68165971

I'm confused?! You are the one getting all hung up on pronouns. The point I originally made was about conflating trans people with sex offending, a bit like what the Daily Mail seems to do. Many people don't know a trans person so if all they ever read about trans people is related to sex offending it is no wonder there is a problem with transphobia.

I couldn't give a monkeys what she called her/him/itself, I was just using she because that is what the article used. She/He/whatever is just a sex offender, whatever pronouns is used doesn't change that. LOL at Mr obsessed above.