aintforever

That’s where we disagree.

I would take anything under 4 right now, just hope it’s not too embarrassing.

That’s mental. We just have to hope all their contracts have relegation clauses or if Dragon is willing to take a punt on bouncing straight back or we could be fucked. Our future basically depends on what a Serbian business man wants to do. We could easily do a Bournemouth and go straight back up or easily do a Pompey if he decides to cut and run.

Well as his abject failure in front of goal is one of the reasons we are being relegated maybe he will do the decent thing and try and get us promoted next year as we are finally down to his level.

It’s mental that this cunt’s failure to score is one if the main reasons we are going down yet he might end up being the first rat out of here and end up back in the Prem.

Too young to remember that, just remember them ruining my first trip to Wembley. Hate the cunts.

Na, still hate the cunts after the Zenith a data Systems final. Wankers.

Yes Brentford score. fucking hate Forest.

Except right from the start I shave said her remarks were wrong, crass and offensive. I can see how suggesting there is a hierarchy of racism can be anti-Semitic, if it was said with the deliberate aim of offending Jews. In this context I read it as someone trying to highlight how they think the racism they have suffered is worse than others. Wrong and offensive but not anti-Semitic, but only Abbot knows what her intentions were. The situation with Starmer is simple, he has to appear to be tough on anything that could be perceived as anti-Semitic wether it was or not because of the history under Corbyn.

Make your own mind up.

That’s only if you can believe a reasonably intelligent person can attend parties without knowing that there were parties happening.

She was suspended for what she wrote, it was offensive and wrong even if it wasn’t ant-Semitic. Starmer just expressed his opinion afterwards. No one knows wether he genuinely believes she is anti-Semitic except him. In my opinion he was just being pragmatic to avoid a media shit storm, not a big deal at all.

Of course there is, I didn’t feel like I had to explain the obvious. Clearly I do for you.

Exactly

See, you’re lying now. No one can genuinely believe that all lies are the same unless they are completely thick. Oh hold on…

Just trying to point out that everyone lies. Thought someone of you are would have figured that out by now.

No I asked a question, the clue was in the question mark.

Who doesn’t lie?

How do you know he lied?

Not at all, getting shot of Abbot is a good move for Labour and the country.

Abbot threw herself under the bus. We can all read what she said and draw our own conclusions, you don't need Starmer to tell you what to think. If you read the article you will see that Starmer was pushed three times to say wether it was anti-semitic or not. They were desperate for him to say she was not so they can carry on with the 'Labour is anti-semitic' headlines. Luckily Starmer is not as dumb as Corbyn.

No he's just playing the game. If he said they were not anti-semitic the papers would just blow it up out of proportion, say he's defending an anti-semite etc. The same shit they did with Corbyn. It's all about optics, he has to appear to be strong on anti-semitism because of what went on before.

Yes, but some do a lot worse.

no

No one decent is going to want to take over just to experience relegation.