aintforever

Three centre backs on the bench and just one in the starting line-up, fuck me.

This. His positioning and anticipation are just awful. When you compare him to Ramsdale it’s like chalk and cheese. Where Ramsdale would be positioned correctly it would just be a simple save or block, same situation with Baz and he would be floundering around flapping like an idiot because he’s a couple of yards from where he should be stood - doesn’t look like an obvious keeper error when it goes in but it invariably is. Xg stats are very crude but in Baz’s case they do paint the right picture.

To be fair to Dragan, at least he has shown he is willing to invest. If Spores appoints a decent manager and they get recruitment right in the summer we should be in pretty good shape to challenge next season. Big if though.

Didn’t we almost beat the team that stuffed us today away from home with a late winner ruled out by a dodgy VAR decision? I agree we only looked good in patches, but that was more than this clown.

Russel Martin’s sides were frustrating because they often played well but made stupid mistakes that led to defeats. Under this manager it is just complete dogshit from start to finish.

Did anyone of us really have to see Aribo at centre back to know it wouldn’t work. Seriously.

A good manager gets the players to play for him, that’s his job.

The bloke is clueless.

Juric is making him look like a football genius at the moment.

They clearly don’t know what they are doing. It’s mind boggling why a dragon is trusting them with his money.

I just assumed that was sarcasm, cheering some cunt who has spent the last couple if seasons stealing a living.

This is miles worse than anything Russel Martin turned out, the manager is completely out if his depth. That doesn’t excuse the players though, bunch of wankers just going through the motions.

The bloke is clueless, get shot now. Aribo at centre back when you have two on the bench, fuck off.

I would tend to agree with that, I wouldn’t be surprised if things end up carrying on pretty much as they are but with Europe stumping up the cash.

You are according to the Refugee Convention.

I’m not commenting on how they should be treated, just saying that travelling through a safe country doesn’t necessarily make someone an economic migrant. If you are fleeing a war zone you are a refugee, regardless of where you go and how you get there, or wether it’s legal or not.

I agree. But desperate people will do what they think is best for them.

I get the problems with taking in too many, I'm not disputing that or advocating open boarders. My point is that just because someone travelled travelled through a safe country doesn't automatically make them an economic migrant. Someone fleeing a warzone is in a very vulnerable position, there are many reasons why they might go to a specific country where they feel safe. If you have lost your house, job and most of your possessions overnight, you are going to need help. You will naturally want to go where you have contacts, family or speak the same language.

It was a hypothetical scenario you bellend. Just giving you an example of a situation where a refugee fleeing war might travel through a safe country and be an illegal immigrant but wouldn’t be an economic migrant.

Isn’t the issue the fact that Russia’s economy is now geared up for war? Right now they are probably weak but in 5 or so years time they could be a serious threat unless we increase our forces.

A refugee coward, not economic migrant coward. Apology accepted.

And a refugee, not an economic migrant, despite being illegal and going via a safe country. You get it yet? If you are fleeing war you are a refugee, wether you get into a country legally or illegally doesn’t change that. Wether you stopped at the first safe country or not doesn’t change that.

It’s an important point, labelling refugees as economic migrants just because they came here via a safe country is wrong. If Putin starts lobbing missiles at us and I travel through France to my mate’s gaff in Spain to stay safe I would not be an economic migrant, even if how I got there was illegal.

No I said a Frenchman wasn’t fleeing war.

If you are fleeing war you are a refugee, wether you enter a country legally or illegally doesn’t change that fact.