aintforever

What question did he ask?

Luckily, you don’t need to spend billions on a navy to sink a Russian Missile Cruiser:

I just assumed it was Johnson. Either because Boris sounds like a name you would give a dog, or because he humps everything in sight. I’m sure our resident Gammon will fill you in.

Think Labour and the Lib Dems would be happier.

Yeah, because for starters it’s over 2000km away and we would have to go through half of Europe. Bit like what the mighty Russian Army would have to do.

Yet they couldn’t even take Kiev.

Politicians and the media will always lie, mislead and manipulate, it's making the leap from that to these bizarre conspiracy theories that is the crazy part.

MLT was my hero growing up, wether he was our best ever is debatable but he certainly was the most skilful and entertaining player I have seen in a Saints shirt. Probably the most naturally gifted player the premier league has seen. His views are as mad as a box of frogs though which is a shame. Everyone is entitled to their opinion but when someone in his position talks such nonsense in the media it can be dangerous.

In the current climate it does seem like a good idea to increase spending on the military. On the other hand though the much-feared Russian army couldn't even make it to Kiev without getting it's ass kicked so not sure they are much of a threat to us over here.

Looks like it worked. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68165971

I'm confused?! You are the one getting all hung up on pronouns. The point I originally made was about conflating trans people with sex offending, a bit like what the Daily Mail seems to do. Many people don't know a trans person so if all they ever read about trans people is related to sex offending it is no wonder there is a problem with transphobia.

I couldn't give a monkeys what she called her/him/itself, I was just using she because that is what the article used. She/He/whatever is just a sex offender, whatever pronouns is used doesn't change that. LOL at Mr obsessed above.

You are so thick it is scary. I know it was an Echo article, the clue is the logo at the top of the page. Try reading what I posted again, I was comparing Hypo to the Mail for his choice of post. Some sex offenders and male, some are female and some are trans - we all know that. The only reason I can see why someone would choose to share a link to a sex offenders story on a LGBT History Month thread is to feed the narrative that trans gender people are in some way perverts. Just like the Daily Mail seem to do.

Couldn’t tell you from that pic. I wouldn’t want to find out either way TBH.

“Ale House”

Looks like another Tranny to me.

She’s a trans woman, I thought the article was quite clear on that.

You don’t have to say it slowly, just put the right words down. Well done. In answer to your question, editorial style. Stories involving trans people always seem to get more attention from the likes of The Mail than worse crimes committed by men. There is an obvious narrative.

And in English...

Good to see you keep up with the Daily Mail type flow of stories to feed the narrative. The person involved is just a pervert regardless of what gender they are. Far more men commit this sort of crime and worse.

I was thinking the same, going forward he could be improved on. Probably shouldn’t undervalue the defensive work he does though.

Exactly. Remember the outrage from the nob heads on here when “from the river to the sea” was mentioned. Hamas want Israel off the map and they are terrorists, Israel want Palestine off the map and it’s “why don’t we light up Wembley”.

I'm not saying I agree with it, it's just the way it is. It's tough on Ukraine but I can't see NATO countries wanting to take the risk, it's big risk with article 5 and all that.

I didn't say we would have no worry of being bitten back should we go to war, try reading. My point was as it stands not a single NATO soldier has been killed (obviously special forces may be involved that we don't know about) or Russia hasn't laid a foot on NATO territory. Whilst Russians are being killed on their tens of thousands and they are losing all sorts of hardware. There is no reason why NATO would want Ukraine to join up at the moment.

Most do. I expect language and family connects are two reasons why some might feel safer here.