aintforever

Mental that they disallowed that goal, Son got flicked but he was trying to grab the Utd player at the time.

That would only be the inference if sports events are awarded solely on the basis of a countries record on human rights. If I really need to explain the faults of Russia and China you really are a thick old gammon cunt.

Ndidi should have got a red card then.

I never said that China had a better human rights record than Qatar, you obviously have problems reading.

Not sure what that has got to do with their suitability to host a World Cup. Their human rights record is just one of the reasons why they shouldn’t have been awarded it, in my opinion. i get why sometimes countries like Russia and China get to host these things despite their obvious faults, but the Qatar decision was just illogical and corrupt.

Lol, I think most people assumed a scummy country like Qatar wouldn’t even get a look in.

Obviously good for convenience and the local economy but it does make a mockery of our so called attempts at combating climate change.

How could you protest before the decision? No one was expecting the corrupt old fucker to pull Qatar out the envelope, I don’t think many people even knew they were deciding on the 2022 hosts at the time either.

Would make it a bit quicker but you will still have the same margin of error issues. They just need to use big fat lines for each player and if there is any overlap then he’s onside.

Though 2 mins silence at the footie was a bit OTT, I didn’t realise the length of time is meant to be proportionate to their supposed importance. How long are we going to give the queen when she snuffs it 3 or 4?

Signed. For the reasons mentioned, but also because it’s going to be shit.

Going from the boots or anywhere else won’t make any difference, they just need to allow for the margin of error of the person pausing the video and give the benefit of doubt to the attacker.

Makes sense. It’s probably just a matter of time before a vaccine evading strain emerges so you want to get infection rates right down and hopefully be in a position where isolated outbreaks can be dealt with through test track and trace.

What a load of bollocks, there is no government on the planet that wants to close stuff down and pay people to sit on their arses at home and watch Netflix. Our government are probably being over cautious because they have fucked up before and the language is all doom and gloom because they don’t want people jumping the gun before the vaccines have been fully rolled out.

I agree, but the numbers in hospital during the last wave was very high, and that was with a lockdown. Even with a decent amount of people vaccinated, a return to normal now might see another spike. Or they are more worried about a vaccine evading mutation than they are letting on.

I doubt all the vulnerable have, plus it’s not only the vulnerable who die or get effected by long Covid so It probably makes sense to delay the sex parties until June.

They are just being over cautious with their language because they know if they say it’s all going to be over in a couple of months a large chunk of the population will just dive straight in with their sex parties and there will be another wave before the vaccines are properly rolled out.

To be fair there is only one poor result in that list, losing to Villa at home.

Great news if true.

That’s what they said on the radio, it will be interesting to see it again. I noticed the ref was only shown the tackle and not what happened just before it in the pitch side replay.

Get in, we can beat these northern cunts

Shit defending, shit goalkeeping

I wouldn't have clue who organised what but the Clapham shit-show definitely looked like it swelled the numbers: https://www.cityam.com/londoners-protest-against-police-after-murder-of-sarah-everard/ Notabley: "Monday’s protest proceeded for several hours without the same heavy-handed police tactics, following widespread criticism of Saturday’s events" Weird that the plod changed tactics for this one considering they handled Clapham so perfectly.

They manage to do it in the US, in California for example, people in occupations with a high chance of exposure (including teachers and the police) are in the same group as the over 65s. Now we have got to the stage where we are vaccinating 40 something print cartridge salesmen, it makes sense to me to prioritise certain professions.

The high-risk people have been done you bell-end, I’m talking about now we are down to people in their 40s. Surely it makes sense to vaccinate those who face people every day before those sat at home all day - even a thick old gammon like you should get that.