
aintforever
Subscribed Users-
Posts
15,561 -
Joined
Everything posted by aintforever
-
OK. Who specifically is controlling the ‘MSM’,what are they hoping to achieve and why?
-
You are so thick it is funny.
-
Off the top of my head... 1. Guns n Roses, Paradise City 2. Pearl Jam, Black 3. Air, You Make It Easy 4. Beatles, Something 5. Metallica, For Whom the Bell Tolls 6. Nick Cave, Into My Arms 7. Amy Winehouse, You Know I’m No Good 8. Mazzy Star, Fade Into You 9. Oasis, Masterplan 10. Nirvana, Drain You
-
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
aintforever replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
Not sure U-turns were high on the list of criticism of the three you mention there. Labour have made a rocky start but whoever won the last election would have had difficult decisions to make given the state of what they inherited. I don’t agree with all they have done but they are definitely an improvement on the chaos that preceded them. At least they appear to be thinking long term and getting on with the job not infighting and just desperately trying to start culture wars every 5 mins. That in itself is refreshing. -
You’re the fuckwit who interpreted ‘safe’ as meaning zero percent chance of anyone having side effects. It’s because of people like you they have to write ‘may contain nuts’ on packets of peanuts.
-
Says the person who ignores the fact that when you were given a jab you were also given a leaflet explaining the risks. The Covid jab greatly reduces the chances of getting seriously ill but like most vaccines has a tiny risk of side effects - of course it is fair to describe it as safe.
-
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-vaccination-and-blood-clotting - from 2021 Regardless of whatever Bozo said, we were still told of the risks. You are talking shite as usual.
-
That's just complete bollocks. I remember being given a leaflet explaining the risks on my first and having the risks explained to me on one of my later jabs. Not to mention reading/hearing about the risks involved numerous times in the media.
-
I would rather Iran didn’t have nukes but they are a sovereign nation with every right to defend themselves. My concern with Trump acting like the World police is that countries like a Russia and China might hate that more than the idea of Iran having WMDs and just help them develop, or just supply them nukes to prove a point.
-
Great news that it has passed, there are obvious concerns but definitely the right thing to do. The positives from amount of suffering it will stop will far outweigh any negatives IMO.
-
They have been proven liars, it’s obvious they are not just targeting terrorists.
-
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
aintforever replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
They have already raised the income threshold to 35K - do pensioners on more than that really need state handouts? I agree they should tax the rich more, problem is when Labour do it they are cunts for stealing our hard earned cash and handing it out to lazy scroungers, if the Tories do it it’s because they have no choice. -
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
aintforever replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
It's only you and mad Nic that don't seem to understand the difference in the fundamental ideologies of the two main parties. Labour will always get more slack when cutting benefits, just like the Tories do when they have to raise taxes. Sunak had to raise taxes when he was PM, just like Labour have to make cuts now. -
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
aintforever replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
I knew you would miss the point. -
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
aintforever replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
‘Nice and cuddly’ what are you on about? We all know that Labour are the party that love to blow all our hard-earned tax money on benefits for scroungers. I doubt Labour enjoyed cutting benefits any more than the last Tory government enjoyed raising our taxes. -
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
aintforever replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
Yeah of course, we all know the Tories tend to choose lower tax and lower spending on benefits, Labour generally choose to go the other way. -
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
aintforever replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
I think the difference is you can be pretty sure Labour are cutting benefits because there is little choice, not for ideological reasons. They are traditionally the party that tends to hand out too much IMO, it’s really not hard to understand why people react to the two parties differently. -
Possibly, but it’s a tough one. Farke is obviously a risk at that level but it is probably more of a risk to rip it all up and try and start afresh just after promotion. I think the best chance any promoted team has is to keep a cohesive team together and try to add a bit of quality.
-
Why is watching England play so fucking boring?
-
I guess we will find out this year how easy it is to bounce straight back up.
-
This. He was a spectacular failure last season but he did get us promoted at the first attempt and the day out at Wembley is up there amongst my favourites as a Saints fan, I wish him well.
-
I don’t, I said IF he was tailgating, as reported at the time. Best wait til the trial, it is a weird one that’s for sure.
-
I said IF it was true that he was tailgating it would suggest he was in a hurry. I was just going by was reported at the time. Best wait til the trial. From what I saw from the videos it looks to me like a case of road rage spiralling out of control, the video that supposedly showed the start of it it appears to me that the crowd only got violent AFTER be started driving aggressively (reversing back and forward quickly). Obviously something may have happened before that and we will never get the full picture until the trial so it is all just speculation at the moment.
-
How do you know he didn’t know which way he was going?
-
I thought it was reported that he tail-gated an ambulance, it should become clear in the trial what happened but if true it would suggest he was in a hurry or frustrated. From what I saw of the first incident it looked as if the crowd only became violent when he started reversing and driving in a dangerous manner. Obviously something may have happened prior to the first video though so who knows.