aintforever

Forcing a deal that doesn’t involve Ukraine handing over more territory and cutting Ukraine’s forces in half would be a start. Caving in to Russia is only going to cause more problems in the future.

Yes of course. I would expect a good manager with our squad to get a result at Charlton though.

Exactly, the deal means conceding the “Fortress Belt” which is three cities Russia have been unable to take in over three years.

Of course they will, how naive are you? Why else would they insist on limiting Ukraine’s military? They will have a handy break in the fighting whilst they rebuild their forces, engineer a break of the ceasefire then just crack on where they left off knowing full well that the US and NATO are terrified of going to war.

The deal would mean Ukraine handing over key areas they currently control. They have had guarantees from the US and Russia before but they are not worth the paper they are written on. Russia will obviously just carry on and invade further, why else would they insist on limiting Ukraine’s military?

Tonda has had the whole international break to work with the squad so there are no excuses, we need three points from this.

NATO/Europe should step up military aid and put more pressure on Russia to except better terms, this proposed deal is just a surrender. It won’t help NATO/US long term, they just look weak as fuck.

The US has put Ukraine in an incredibly difficult position now. The choices here are: - continuing fighting with added disadvantage - surrendering now AND getting invaded again later Trump really is a cunt..

That’s why we will never attract a decent manager while they are running the show.

And you will never stop moaning about it. Fact is we needed the US to win WW2, we will need them to beat Russia regardless of how much we spend on our military in the UK.

Whoever made the decision is irrelevant, sacking a manager before having a replacement lined up is just a fuck up.

…because the clowns in charge have failed to act decisively again. A new, experienced manger should have been brought in the day after Still got sacked. It’s as if their strategy is: Because we don’t know what we’re doing, hiring anyone is a gamble. So let’s just give another cheap yes man a crack and see if it works again.

They’ve been fighting for over three years and still haven’t made it a third of the way across Ukraine, I don’t think we have too much to worry about.

It’s much better than most countries.

So it looks like they are going from appointing someone on the basis of having one OK season at Lens to appointing someone because he has won two games of football. You couldn’t fucking make it up.

As the last appointment was such an obvious gamble you would have thought they would already have some candidates lined up just in case. Oh no, not this bunch of clowns. We’re going to get weeks of dithering before the inevitable unveiling of someone completely unsuitable.

Don’t you get a state pension regardless of wether you’ve worked or not?

Because if we hire an experienced manager who knows what he’s doing his first question to the owners would be “Who is this Spors twat and why is he telling me who I should sign?”.

Yeah but the problem is if he doesn’t start well it would soon turn toxic, that won’t help anyone.

They would be mental to appoint Eckert on the basis of the last two performances, we were lucky to get a win at QPR and Wednesday were just awful.

This. Instead of taking a step and making a simple save he seems to freeze then fling himself like an idiot.

Classic Bazunu goal

I’m not bothered by the Skate connection but it is obviously not ideal, fact is some of the fan base are so it won’t give him much of a honeymoon period.

That's probably because you are old and you had the winter fuel allowance to put towards one of your holidays.

O’Neil would be nowhere near the top of my list but given the potentially batshit crazy style of appointment SR could make I would be reasonably happy.