From the looking at the tackle on virgin media they both went into the tackle with 2 feet off the ground & was nothing more than a 50-50 challenge, if Euell had been a fraction of a second earlier would the Wolves player have had the red card instead???
Because that is what we are talking about BOTH players did the same thing therefore if Euell deserved a red card then so did the Wolves player, as the "intent" was the same.
You can argue that all our spendings off this season have been technically correct, but when these same things occur in other games & against us & nothing is done we do seem to be getting the Butt end of the decisions at the moment. But isn't that always the way when at the bottom of the league.