redorwhitelion

Assuming the teams on minus ten points have a reasonable season it effectively becomes -9.5 points thanks to the goal difference.

Always been indifferent to him, but he had a real opportunity at the start of this season to score a lot of goals. I couldn't question his motives with regards to contracts and money as I don't know the guy, but from a football point of view I have very little sympathy for him.

Come on you Chesham! It'd be nice if I could walk to an away game one day!

I didn't find it particularly hilarious either, but bad taste???? You must be very easily offended!

I wouldn't mind the tease element of it, if the the joke was any good or not completely predictable.

I like fluffy kittens - roasted with shallots.

Some of the venom sent in his direction is unfair. I always felt he was working hard and was most effective when used as an old fashioned centre forward. Why the football world, including Euell himself, think that he is a midfielder is beyond me.

God - this is all so serious. I only come here for the rumours, that's the most fun thing about football and fottball message boards. More outrageous ITKs the better in my opinion.

I really can't see the point of starting a thread like this.

Any sort of decent form and the average attendance with be comfortably over 20k.

Its not like Wotton has spent 10 years playing in the Premier League either, although I'm sure he's done alright for himself the past few years. But I bet the guy has a family and mortgage to worry about like the rest of us.

Seems a reasonable incentive to keep them in shape during the close season.

If Saints want rid of him, what better way than to maintain as high a profile for him as possible.

Crazy thread - the shambles at St Mary's as nothing to do with the bank. At some point a creditor is going to ask for their money back, or at least the interest payments, rather than dishing out extra capital. somewhere along the line the level of risk pasted the tipping point and Barclays called in the debt. Sounds like fairly standard practise to me. They couldn't allow Lowe to keep running the club on the never-never throwing good money after bad. They had to draw the line somewhere, whether we like it not.

Please refer to Saintrobbie's previous post where he referred to 'LOYALTY' (his capitals not mine) and the 'sinking ship'. Not a dig at Robbie specifically, but just pointing out the inaccuracy of your statement.