Puddings and Monkeys

Where the **** have you been since we got relegated??? Talk about OTT reaction from you bunch of jester hat wearing poofs FFS.

I bet you they won't have to pay that amount - Aviva and Barclays will take whatever the best offer is; better than getting sweet FA. Same principle as the news story today that the world famous Acme whistle company (makes referee's whistles) was able to get a new peice of equipment usually costing £80K at £5K because the previous owner went into admininstration. Admin is a way that a buyer can pick the club up on the cheap.

No,,,it's called gobbing your moany, whingning mouth off over something you knew nothing about and then looking a total ***t. HTH.

Hold on to$$er...weren't you the one who just a few days ago was slagging off the Administrator because things were taking so long? Shows how little you know eh ****wit?

So why the **** would they do that and lose the value in their shares (after all they are only in it for the money right?), whilst also making themselves liable for charges for not acting in the Company's best interests?

Why not come along though and (like me) hurl abuse at the lazy, spineless, bottlers who currently wear our famous red and white shirts. They deserve total humiliation for the way they have capitulated this season and played with no pride whatsoever. Only a small number are exempt from this - the rest should hang their ****ing heads in shame at what they have done. We deserve better.

Quite...the player who "disgraced the shirt" could end up as our saviour.......

Quite...but don't let sense and reason stop the miserable git having a moan.

He has a legal obligation to get the best deal for the creditors - i.e. Aviva and Barclays come first.

I was there too; pitch was like a sandy beach....happy days. Ran on at the end and asked Shilton for his gloves but he said he needed them - tight b@stard!!

Ah...you're a mouthpiece for others...cool.

Well apparently you were the font of all knowledge on this yetserday. Here's what you said when we didn't sell anyone: "Or, a bank manger that turned round and said: "even if you sell your best players it won't be enough to keep you afloat I'm afraid" In that scenario, why would we bust a gut to sell anyone if it didn't change things enough financially? So, there is a train of thought that says not selling our best players could be a bad sign financially. Of course, the flip side could indeed be true." Mmm....so what's your therry today then?

Well if that were the case then the creditors would shut us down now to stop the losses increasing and them having even less chance of getting their money back. Not to mention that Mr Wilde would be selling off all he could to salvage something for his shares. So I think you are just grasping at straws. Why can't you just accept that there isn't some big conspiracy going on and maybe we're not such a basket case financially as some of the "Experts" on here would like us to beleive to suit their ani Lowe/crouch/Wilde agendas. Lowe out, Wilde out, Crouch out.

The point is about the double standards of so many people on here. If Dyer gets sold to Swansea today (apparently they have made a 500K bid and if we are about to go into admin as so many experts on here predict, then surely we won't be to turn that down will we) people like you will be up in arms about the ineptitude of SFC management in letting him go. Look at the facts - Nathan Dyer has done absolutely **** all for SFC except cost us a lot of money, yet all of a sudden he'll be the greatest football player the world has ever seen and we're doomed now he's gone. Fickle, fickle "tabloid" fans - it gets worse and worse. Check back to the posts when the nightclub incident came out - the same people who couldn't wait to get him out the door then will the the ones slagging off the club for doing exactly that. I think this is my last available post today so can't be back to carry on this lovely discussion with you. Lowe, Crouch and Wilde out.

"Shock horror - poster has a go at fellow Saints fan without engaging brain first."

I hope you weren't one of those shouting that Dyer should never wear the shirt again after his misdemeanour. Some of those who were are now doing the biggest u turn ever.

No, we are going into admin; people like Stanley and Alpwhine want it to happen and say it will happen so it must be true as they are always right.

FFS!! Yes...that's why he's all over the web site, tv, radio etc all the time isn't it? Oh...he's not is he? A short while ago people on here were berating him for not being visible and for "sitting back while Rome burns". Some people hate him just because he's Rupert Lowe - not because of what he does or doesn't do.

Why would Barclays ask them to step down when they have drastically improved the financial position? Even if they did, why would they want Crouch back in...someone they associate with letting costs run out of control.

It's called a Shareholder's Agreement - standard way of dealing with a situation like this.

He says he can buy a player...kind of dumps on the mongs on here who want us to go into administration.

If I'm reading it right he only has 13 mins on the pitch and came on when his team were 2-0 up. Can't really read too much into that eh?

All recent chairmen...I should probably have said.

All SFC chairmen have been crap; the only bright spot has been WGS' tenure under Lowe. The club does not need ANY of them back - a totally new person, untarred by mistakes of the past (on all sides) and without any of the separate factions that support Lowe and Crouch is now what we need.

What will the reaction be if we go 2 nil up?