Jump to content

TWar

Members
  • Posts

    3,737
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by TWar

  1. Probably boufal and Austin. Dunno where lemina would go atm. Sent from my G3311 using Tapatalk
  2. Source? Sent from my G3311 using Tapatalk
  3. Good chance for them to let us know the targets we were after and just couldn't get across the line. Sent from my G3311 using Tapatalk
  4. Would be good for us. We already have a stupidly large squad.
  5. 1) 8th 2) 3rd round (unlucky draw at a huge side) 3)semi final 4) che adams 5) che adams 6) Armstrong will become a valuable midfielder in a 433 and prove a bargain 7) promoted in 2nd Sent from my G3311 using Tapatalk
  6. How do you know this by the way? I notice you have become a source on this transfer but I didn't catch why.
  7. As a scientist, this comment hurt me. Of course it is, why do you think people bother doing these studies?! And simulation is great and absolutely aids the study not diminishes otherwise, again, why would they do it?
  8. Not anymore, Sheffield United have got Henderson back on loan and villa look to have picked up Tom Heaton Sent from my G3311 using Tapatalk
  9. L'Equip reported Wolves were bidding £35m for this cb earlier in the window, seems he is probably out of our means.
  10. In: Upamecano, Phillips Out: lemina, Austin, Stephens (loan) , hoedt, and boufal Sent from my G3311 using Tapatalk
  11. We had a few in December I think Sent from my G3311 using Tapatalk
  12. Why are you judging defensive midfielders on goals and assists? I did watch a bit of Leeds and he looked good. Didn't watch much Fulham but I think it is pretty universally agreed that Seri struggled. His value has almost halved. Sent from my G3311 using Tapatalk
  13. We were, but 30m was quoted at the time. If Villa pick him up for 15m over us would be quite upset.
  14. It is a bit hopeful but I like having a massive signing linked that is like a 20% chance at best. Last window we had augustin, the time before was Promes, its exciting. Can't remember last time we pulled one off, hopefully upamecano will break the trend. Also further, I remember Seri last summer was linked to all the top sides especially arsenal and ended up at Fulham, so these things can happen. (Seri was very poor in the end but let's forget about that) Sent from my G3311 using Tapatalk
  15. No one hopes they will fail, we just don't think he is there quite yet. Looks talented but a bit raw, hopefully will come good in the coming year or two. You however seem to be hilariously obsessed with him.
  16. They must be good then. Did you watch that game? Our youth team beat them 4-0. Are you Klarer's dad or something?!
  17. You responded to transfer speculation with "Is he really better than Klarer?" which we all thought was very funny as he has never played a senior game and Upamecano is starting most games for a champions league side. While we are at it, can you find an example of anyone saying "it's not OK to praise him and anyone who does is an idiot as the perceived 'wisdom' on here is that he is rubbish and a million miles from ever being a Premier League player." as that is far more of a ridiculous characterisation. Some people said he was a bit raw and needed time but that's it.
  18. Imagine having people disagree with you that he isn't better than Upamecano and taking from it that "it's not ok to praise him". Also, I don't know if you are watching the game but i'd say the oppo are a reasonable way off premier league standard.
  19. "We will never buy players for 30-40m" Bit disappointing. When he said he wouldn't buy for 40-50m before I thought that was probably fair but you'd hope if the right player was available for 30m we could be in for them eg. Phillips of Leeds. After all, clubs like Newcastle, West Ham, Leceister, Everton can spend that plus the top 6. We don't want to be fundamentally be forced to always be in the bottom half of the table max-spending wise.
  20. Anyone know if tomorrows game will be streamed?
  21. Maybe someone else came back overweight and slattery was frozen out as he was playing hard ball with the contract and we just made a false connection Sent from my G3311 using Tapatalk
  22. Don't care about your argument, just saying your evidence is nonsense and wrong, which it is. Anyway as has been said no one else cares so if you have any further points pm me. Sent from my G3311 using Tapatalk
  23. To be fair, this is because a new guy tagged in and starting saying equally dumb things. But no, you are right, my apologies. Any further conversation about this will take place via PM.
  24. That is not my point at all. I'm not making an over-arching point whatsoever, just correcting misinformation. Wolves did better because they signed better players and had a better core from the championship with Doherty and Neves being two of their best players. You are trying to read in to what I am saying but all I am trying to get across is: 1) Wolves outspent Fulham 2) Wolves signed more players than Fulham 3) "Wolves bought 91% of a new first XI" (your one) 4) "For a long time, received wisdom has been that anything more than 2-3 signings is proof of a team in turmoil who are bound for the drop." (you again) Are all absolutely wrong, and such stupid misinformation makes it hard to discuss things factually. Also, as I haven't explained why the last one is nonsense pick a year at random and count the number of transfers in for each club. I'll pick 2007 and note that the average amount of transfers was around 6-7, the lowest was Blackburn with 3 and the highest was liverpool with 18. Now correct me if I'm wrong but I don't remember liverpool being "a team in turmoil who are bound for the drop". Pick a different year and see if you get a different result where the norm is 2-3 signings. (Source btw https://sportslens.com/summer-2007-premiership-transfers/) Again, no overarching point, just sick of trying to have an informed conversation on here when people come on and post such easily disprovable stuff.
  25. Wolves in no way bought 91% percent of a new 11. Neves, Doherty, Coady, Bennett and saiss all played in the championship. I'd say just over half of there starting team were new. It's high but it's no where near 91%. Also that is not the received wisdom at all. 5-7 transfers has always been pretty standard. Also, obviously newly promoted sides will sign more. There is a lot of misinformation on here regarding wolves. Sent from my G3311 using Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...