Jump to content

danjosaint

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    1,975
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

danjosaint's Achievements

  1. It's from the correspondent article Frannies tache posted about 2 wks ago. It was about Mityjland not us but a good insight to RA
  2. They weren't tough chances Sunday
  3. Got to be Navy for me over black
  4. And 4 months in a row voted defender of the month in Portugal
  5. Thats the article, knew id seen it somewhere, really good read and explains a hell of a lot
  6. There's a qoute from RA from his time at Mitjyland saying something like your eyes lie to you when watching a player, so they dont hence why its done on data analysis
  7. It helps that their physically suited to epl not like we were
  8. Phillipe Clement was available
  9. Thats what I meant, with the 4 it allows the extra body in midfield, think it was Mainoo. So the overall formation looked so much more balanced , we suffer from getting overrun in midfield , if we sat a 2 of Jander/Downes/Charles/Bragg in front of a 4 of Jelert/THB/Quarshie/? Then play Leo/Stewart or AA/ Fellows .... why wouldn't that work
  10. It wasn't even the 4atb its the fact they closed off the centre of the pitch with their extra midfielder, sat in, let city try and break them down and hit them on counter with their pace, they did it extremely well and it could've been 4 or 5. We have the players to play that bar questions over left back so there isn't a valid reason why we couldn't play that
  11. No no no its nothing to do with formations and managers as some would believe on here
  12. Nothing to do with the fact he scored 4/5 in the cup against a 3rd division French side just before we bought him
  13. People do forget we were poor under RK at a point he was going out the door at Christmas time until results massively improved
  14. Having a beer with Jan Koller
×
×
  • Create New...