Fabrice29

That’s a wild response to a Paul Onuachu chat 😂 Anyway, to keep things on topic, he’d have been great for us, especially if you ignore the time he actually played for us and wasn’t great.

If we’re writing off this season. (I’m not saying we should) then is giving Eckert the rest of the season to build up his experience not a worthwhile plan? If we’re not writing off this season then is bringing in a manger who last season couldn’t get much out of our best striker really a great plan?. (And I like Mowbray btw)

Tbh, I can’t find it. There’s this podcast when House states someone is advising Dragan to go for more experience but doesn’t say who. I’m sure he or Blackmore have said Rasmus is their footballer advisor so maybe I’ve over assumed.

Hell of a claim for a player who has done this twice (I think) in his career so far and not outside of Belgium.

Wasn’t it widely considered that Rasmus was the advisor advising Solak not to appoint TE?

Piroe is an interesting one because he plays in similar parts of the pitch as Armstrong which means he’ll drop deep and look to link play. I think we need a channel runner personally but he does have the traits to play that deep/link play that we like with the physical upgrades.

Yes but they didn’t answer it did they. They just said they thought the reason of fitness and won’t help him win the game was bullshit and Alfie said himself he asked four times because he didn’t believe the manager but neither offered up what they believed to be the real reason behind his exclusion. That’s all I wondered. Wasn’t even meant to be a dig. I was curious 😂 But alas, I won’t ask the content creators about the content they created in the thread to promote the content again. Lesson learnt.

I asked about the content of the podcast in the thread about the podcast, yes. 👍 Just as in the same way you noticed the query in a thread you didn’t start, I didn’t tag you in and didn’t call you anything so you never know.

Again, that’ll be the point of the post. 👍

Yes, that is why I asked in this thread seeing as they normally post the episode. The narrative from the coach is he's not fit. My eyes and everyone else's presumably can see that too. I don't really understand why it's a puzzle, so hopefully whoever posts the episode can respond. Or the typing guy who updates his blog can address it seeing as it was him who called it bullshit.

Right, I heard all that, so why did they think he was left out then?

That’s fair and it should do that job. I wish the club would be better at engaging with its supporters. The lack of clarity is naff and miles away from the weird tactical meetings it held a couple of years ago which even if cringe were at least trying.

I don’t have a conspiracy theory. I believe he’s unfit and therefore of no use to the first team right now, because I’ve seen it with my eyes. It’s the grumpy typing fella and Alfie House suggesting that’s not true (or bullshit as one put it) and I want to know why, because they didn’t go into that detail.

Well I was agreeing with you and even in fact suggesting you've undersold the 80% by 20% because I think you would find 100% of fans would be happy for SR to leave if you guaranteed them a better own. But the reality is it's not like that. You cant just push owners out and get new owners in, it's not employment. So that's where fans apathy to these kind of protests or demands come in because there's no tangible alternative being proposed.

People on this podcast yesterday seemed to be suggesting the Romeu fitness issues told by TE were "bullshit". Do they care to explain why they really think he's being kept out of the team?