Fabrice29

And Armstrong. We only needed 1 they just had to be reliable.

Which would be true if Downs was good/available huh.

People said this last January and the results just got worse. Apathy is the worst thing that can be done and it starts at the top.

It would allow quicker release of passes to the left side of the pitch, like Scienza. You're right though, that's a secondary part.

It shouldn't matter, should be able to do both.

When did they play better? Was it when they took their chances?

Keeper Left footed aggressive centre back. An attacker of sorts who can get us up the pitch, win fouls, throw ins and 50/50's when under pressure and someone to target in the box. Until then it'll be the same.

Just a troll who has been making the same point for a while now. You wet yourselves over things that dont fundamentally change anything on the pitch if you like though.

No, I say that as if neither a formation or manager affected us missing sitters and then capitulating.

We have played it earlier. Should have been 3-0 up .fter 50 minutes today btw, but hey, formations and managers.

It's not that they don't matter but any talk about them is is just masking fundamental flaws. Until we get a keeper who saves shots, a defender who defends it's box properly and a phsyical attacker who is an outlet and threat in the box then any formation, tactic and manager are going to face the same problems all but one of our last 5 managers has.

Hate to say I told you soooooo...but

I agree. He does need some lessons. Old fruit.

Anyway, this game, as always will be dictated by the keeper making saves, defenders defending the box well and strikers being ruthless. Not fancy graphics of formations. Fingers crossed.

So did our run come to an end when we stopped play 2 CB's yeah? Btw, when Stephens actually played as a 3rd CB/Left back in the next game - we got back to winning ways. Just FYI.