Fabrice29

Biggest problem for West Ham this summer is their owners injunctions all being lifted. Relegation and tax bills are going to pale into insignificance. Presumably Bowen gets his move so I wonder if some vested interests mean Fernandes is kept on unless really big offers come in.

He absolutely walks into Man Uniteds midfield right now. Only thing that could stop a move is price/contract length. Will be interesting to see who/if anyone stumps up what West Ham paid us and more.

This is all possible and nobody is assuming anything. It’s just a hypothetical discussion.

Presumably because they have little to be coy about and have also been moved aside from the investigation now.

And wont get in any trouble for doing so, so remind me why we aren’t saying something unofficial again? Is it the same reason that we sent out MLT at half time to tell everyone to stop singing about spying? 🤣

Are you over proper football man Chris Wilder yet? Also this idea I’m anti Tonda when I was one of the very few who was happily taking stick on here for daring to suggest he might be a decent appointment and we shouldn’t sack him a few weeks later is incredible

That’s the whole point of using the media to do it via. Sources say etc. And by the way we’ve already commented like this by telling them we have accepted the charges.

There are differences but also precedence https://www.espn.co.uk/football/story/_/id/42351579/canada-soccer-bev-priestman-olympics-coach-drone-spy-scandal Anyway, I’m imagining the proving he was involved but is probably quite difficult so it’s a mute conversation but this was one of my concerns about the lack of narrative control via local media. It would be very easy and not a big deal to just set the record straight that he wasn’t involved via House/Blackmore if he wasn’t involved…

Again, I think what they do to protect themselves from being spied on by the opposition is check the rules that say the opposition can’t spy on you. It’s not on them to border up their training ground to stop people from Southampton watching them. It’s on Southampton.

That would not be a mitigating factor that would wash with anyone of substance. Also, if Tonda is proven to be involved we won’t need to sack him, he’ll be banned and there is absolutely precedent for that.

He’s got you spreading his name and the podcast he’s on and telling everyone where in the video we can find it. Content creators want you to engage with their content and to engage others. Job done.

What are you on about? 😂

Obviously. No? 😂

I see the sports lawyer that was on talk sport the other day suggesting being kicked out was excessive is slowly changing his mind on that.

Again, for the umpteenth time, it doesn’t matter what’s on the phone.