All Activity

This is where bookmakers odds are not always the best guide in my opinion. Objectively, surely Millwall are more likely for top 2 as it stands. They are ahead of us in the table by a point and have a more favourable last 3 games, the highest placed team they have left to play is Stoke in 17th. The odds putting us above Millwall probably driven by optimistic Saints fans lumping bets on us for 2nd place? Not saying we can't/won't do it, but objectively it still seems against the odds and we should be considered 3rd favourites as it stands behind Ipswich and Millwall.

Consultant

Stop being such a wet fanny.

This. The reality is that Millwall would absolutely kick themselves if Ipswich fluffed it and they didn't win 3 from 3.

Not at all saying that they CAN'T win all three but pointing out again for those who think it is virtually certain......the treble for Millwall to win their last 3 games will pay comfortably over 3/1.

The point stands. I posted a factually correct piece of information which you chose to go out of your way to point out that it came from a source linked with feminism, despite being correct. It puts you in the Turkish club Badger. I thought you were better than that. Why post in response to point out that the post is factually correct?

Oddschecker have us as second favourites to finish top 2- behind Ipswich still. Millwall behind us then boro

A conman doesn't have to be clever if his victims are stupid enough.

Jack Bycroft scored for Exeter on Saturday: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cj40gpe4x2do

Live sports and people in replica shirts? Dear god no, we wouldn't frequent such a low class establishment as that. Not when we're in our country's capital city. There are much finer establishments to be visited.

Sounds good, sure we can help you fill it up with football fans if you give us the name...

Anyone wanting to gate crash franniesTache's up-turned-nose snooty gangbang, they could be referring to The Grand Junction Arms. Let's all make sure we get there bright and early and act as obnoxiously as we can

Ross' hamstrings have done some good work as well 😂

They are using the new revised REFORM Dictionary..... "Review ; verb.....to dismiss and totally reject a previous assessment."

If you want to continue this, then let's; 1) I have as much right as anybody else on here to post bobbins if I so desire. 2) Similarly, if I choose to mildly take the piss out of someone, I have that right as well. 3) The text you posted did indeed appear on SM posts from Feminist News, and these actually were the first 2 that were listed by the GOOGLE search algorithm when reverse searched - as I said I was cross checking the source and veracity of your post as you clearly were not the author and failed to acknowledge this. 4 I did acknowledge the basic accuracy of the text you posted. 5) If you had posted from the Independent's coverage, or any other of the journalistic coverage that came without the sensationalist editorial additions, it would have passed without comment.

I’ve heard rumours that Stoke are about to sign Kelvin Davis on a free until the end of the season.

A trendy bistro with plenty of yuppie sorts, no doubt.

When you say we, are you on about the players or fans?

A grade 2 listed victorian pub that has been used in multiple tv shows and has a fantastic outside space whilst still being on the tube line to wembley

The point is that it was factually correct so I don’t see the problem. How do you know that I didn’t check the information elsewhere? On this particular occasion I took the quote from a thread where several other people added weight to the veracity of the story so I had no reason to think it was incorrect.

nor do it Benjamin but googled it for you

A wine lodge?

This is going to be the week. We will beat Brizzle and Baz and Mad Nate will come up trumps. I can feel it in my water.

I don't Facebook, Michael.

Yes, this is idiotic populist nonsense. The current system barely copes with new applications so how are they going to conduct, as well as fund, a 5 year retrospective review at the same time?