All Activity
- Past hour
-
Blatters ban expires in 2027, he can swoop in and save football
-
50 appearances in 3 years and he wants to leave us hanging before re-signing half arsed because no better offer comes in and we have to wait for him to get match fit again? No thanks.
-
Summer of wildfires. Genuinely curious if these were a regular occurrence in the 19th century?
-
Clipboard charity workers.
-
If it is passed a US investment company is already lined up - founded by Joshua Kushner, the brother of Donald Trump's son-in-law Jared. You really could not make this up.
-
Carbon copy of Blatterer, let's hope he will face the same fate
-
I will do but still waiting for him to creep back to Saints 😄
-
Salech at Cardiff being linked with us anyone think this’ll be a good signing?
-
Who will offer him more, he's mde of glass and a huge risk for anybody that takes him on. Football is not a charity.
-
Time will tell at Fulham but like most ex Saints players I like to see them do well even if it didn't work out at Saints.
-
Uefa have announced that they will boycott all FIFA competitions unless this idea is abandoned
-
Spray
-
The Club does and the Club has already been punished. He is just one of many employees of the Club, for which the owner is responsible, including scouts and analysts. He didn't personally break the 72-hour rule and, by all accounts he didn't instruct anyone to break it. If it happened 73 hours before the game, no rule would have been broken. In a year when FIFA were telling teams they must make their final training sessions open to the public or face punishment, it might just as well have been Middlesbrough who were being punished for a petty breach of an arbitrary rule. It's hardly a serious crime like violence on the pitch. But, the FA will want the publicity that a big headline punishment will garner. Severe punishments are always popular, even if they are inappropriate.
-
And that's making it harsher presumably from the start of the season. Tonda has three instances though.
- Today
-
I know that this is in relation to E3.2 and discrimination but interesting that the minimum 10 match player ban is reduced to 6 if has admitted to the breach at an early opportunity. IMO Tondas ‘offence’ is not as serious as this so should not be worse than this and hopefully less severe. 🤞 https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cn4nlpwq1qyo
-
The whole is related to what Boro have said at start and what they wanted as punishment. No one countered thus at EFL. SKY or main pundits who just want Saints to collapse or get relegated.
-
Much better then, just meet with those you know and stand together. You cant just look at fixtures and think we can all go to Charlton or Millwall and Burnley or Boro may end up only games could do.
-
The charges refer to misconduct and bringing the game into disrepute. No discrimination apparently. But misconduct is a big basket....
-
Still think anything more than a 3 match touchline ban would be overkill, and over 5-6 matches we'd be looking for a new manager. I disagree, as that would be classified as aggravated breach and come under rule E3.2. The reason for my relative optimism is that he's only been charged under E3.1 which would seemingly relate to the act of spying and not the miscellaneous innuendo around bullying.
-
Yeah got quite a hefty contract left on him.
-
So did you enjoy the film then?!
-
For discrimination charge
-
That's only a bit less than 4 months actually, so not that bad.
-
Big difference between stadium and touchline he would still manage on match day in dressing room etc if just touchline.
-
Banned from the entire planet. But actually it's not for 10 games, it's 10 million seconds, which I grudgingly accept as a fair punishment
