Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Replacement for Charles.
  3. Bullshit. I said no such thing.
  4. Of course it's subjective, it all depends what triggers the lunatic.
  5. Sorry, but someone can be dead and a bit of a cunt can't they? You're alive and a bit of a cunt. If you died tonight that wouldn't change.
  6. Overrated ny Rs! He is the only Saints player in recent history that gets people ontheir feet every time he touches the ball. He is genuine game changer and long may he reign here.
  7. Right but the definition of extreme is subjective so actually an incredibly large number of views could "give rise to hate" and "end up turning violent". Someone could call JK Rowling's views extreme for example and then someone could kill her because of them and blame the act of violence on her extreme views.
  8. Better here. Nothing terribly exciting. Neat and tidy. Not bad for a 19 year old. He looks like he lacks a little power in his pass, but maybe the grass just needs a cut.
  9. Are you sure you dont mean Justin Devanny from Crystal Palace (who we were linked with last week)? If not, that feels like a bit of a come down from a semi-regular at Palace to some kids who's played 13 games for St Mirren.
  10. 100%. Even if they weren't though there's no place in civilised society for randoms acts of violence and murder. Problem is some people seem to think that violence is in some way excused because it is violence against someone who holds opposing political views. You can think that Ann Widdecombe was a cunt and simultaneously call out violence committed against her.
  11. I couldn't understand how anyone could do that sort of thing regardless of political views. But it's just a fact that extreme views can give rise to hate and with some nutters in ends up turning violent.
  12. Widdlecombe was old school. Full of sincerity and integrity though (for a politician) and absolutely her views were fine to be aired in a tolerant society
  13. In what way were her views "forced" on anybody ?
  14. Charles will need replacing wont he?
  15. Absolutely embarrassing and classless. Just a reminder he has said that about a nearly 80 year old women beaten to death in her own home. Lovely
  16. It’s not as if they have found a Baader Meinhoff kill list and need to find the cell. But yes semantics
  17. Far better than the shambles of 48 and third place crap. 64 is better. Might need to remortgage though to do the sticker album in 2030.
  18. Almighty jump up from St Mirren.
  19. Good we agree. What I didn’t like about his post was that it read that having an “extreme” view (subjective) means that somebody attacking that person could be understandable. I think the Green Party are extreme (probably stupid more than anything) but I would not go close to understanding why a nutter would harm one of them.
  20. Looked pretty poor in this video, but the comments suggest he had better games.
  21. What a sad post that reflects poorly on you.
  22. I'd say it's semantics really if some nutter has driven across half the country to kill someone because they dislike their political views.
  23. Of course it is not right to attack someone because of their political views, that is obvious. John B is right in that extreme views can give rise to hate though, that works on both sides. The problem is nowadays everything seems more polarised - probably because of social media.
  24. If that were true then Jander is definitely off.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...