All Activity

Why do they insist your passport is 6 months before expiry date before you travel? What’s the point of an expiry date if you can’t use it for 6 months before it expires anyway?

Well after one and a half overs of their innings, I think I can safely say we have virtually no chance of winning this or progressing in this competition. The team is just too weak in all départements.

He hasn't been charged with spying as you well know and furthermore he did not do any spying. His "crime" is unconnected to his activity on the field of play so his sanction should reflect that, more appropriate would be a ban from football activity. How does banning someone from the touchline reinforce that he or anyone else should avoid such activity in the future. But if they offer touchline ban then he should bite their hand off, because its almost meaningless.

A complete ban, 6 months to a year suspended dependent on no further misdeamenours and a fine of 100 k, half suspended.

Good idea, I'd accept that

1 plus from the AI map of Africa. When skynet launches the missiles, none of them are going to land on the targets.

No chance. Only Liverpool are allowed to knock us out of this competition.

Are you suggesting his punishment should only be one that stops him spying? What punishment would stop him spying? An ankle monitor and a curfew?

It's not a mistake. It's a plan. 🙂

And as his offences are nothing to do with touchline behaviour a touchline ban would be a bit silly really. Good for us no doubt but silly. He could in theory carry on spying at will.

And you wonder why people get annoyed at you!

Which one is Trump building?

Uganda is close, so there's that.

I’m not responding as I have other things to do in my day. I’m off to make a Lego deportation camp 😂

Sssshhh !! Yes it would be a disaster, would seriously impact us 😉

1. But are you sending 40k people out there a year, and where are they going to be housed? For instance Rwanda had one hotel, and for 300 people was going to cost £600m without having to build more areas to house people. And if you're elongating the amount of time that number is going to grow, and it won't make a difference to the number of people accepted. How much are you willing to spend on this? Are you willing to spend the £2m per person for 40k per year (£80bn per year)? Wouldn't a small amount of this money invested in better technology and quicker handling of processing be a better deterrent? 2. But what was the actual reason they shut the border? Considering they had just agreed in June 2026 to a raft of new laws, are they already rowing back on those as not strong enough? Why shut the border just to Spain and not to all countries? What is the reason for shutting that border? I know you've said it's the last questions you'll respond to on this, probably because the above aren't proper answers and you know I'll be trying to get some actual details put of you.

There's a possibly Wilson Isidor might be available from Sunderland. That would a no brainer for us given his profile.

Tonda doesn't strike me as a "shouty type" during a match. I don't think a touchline ban would be much of a problem for us.

Last questions I’ll respond to on this: 1. This was one of two initial suggestions I made - so not a solution in isolation. Technically there is no difference. However knowing you are going to be transferred out of Europe when you arrive to Rwanda is a physiological disincentive. For those with uncertain cases / lack of evidence I would ensure processing times are sufficiently enlongated to try to weed out the fakes. 2. By Italy taking this robust stance, as a key member it starts to put pressure on the eu or other eu countries to take the wider matter more seriously if it wants to maintain its core value of free movement. Hopefully other countries threaten this to put the pressure on even more.

Why is being processed in Rwanda or a 3rd country different to being processed in an army barracks in Crowborough that they aren't allowed to leave? Why is what Italy have done a good thing, and what do they hope to achieve from it? You've mentioned both multiple times so you must have some compelling reasons.

Saraya Bevis. Pure filth these days. British WWE wrestler. A film of her wrestling story was made too.

My guess is 10 game touchline ban. Not going to be a big deal, can still run and influence the game, only difference is can't shout at players from the touchline. We'll be fine. More annoyed about the 4 point deduction. Will take a while to catch up with the leading pack. What is Allowed During a Touchline Ban: Dugout Contact: Using phones or staff messengers to relay tactical messages to coaches on the bench. Location: Sitting in the stands or the designated director's box, away from the technical area. Team Talks: Entering the dressing rooms before the match and at half-time.

The issue is not the political leanings of who is posting, the issue is who is posting. For instance, not sure outside of Soggy anyone that has had too much of an issue with @iansums. I think what you'll find is that a number of posters on here do not suffer fools gladly, and unfortunately too many of those posters fall under that banner. Not sure us centrists asking you to answer questions or justify your posts is really quietening dissent, do you? Quite the opposite in fact, we're giving you the chance to state your point. The issue is you fuck it up every time.

The issue is the number of “centrists” that jump on a single post made by someone they don’t agree with. It’s the Spanish Inquisition by multiple centrists that makes responding to queries nearly impossible. It’s death by a thousand cuts. Attack en masse to quieten dissent - I’ve read about that type of strategy before in various countries! No wonder people with alternative views stop posting and it becomes an echo chamber of the “centrists” left. To answer one of the queries I agree that if we could be part of the Dublin agreeemnt that would help as a factor in reducing immigration

“We’re all aboard Ben Garner’s boat”