All Activity

Yes, hence Gibbo's statement on Friday i.e. push for the maximum sanction or we sue

Proof?

Not if the independent commission doesn't consider starting a 'media war' a good thing; if anything, it isn't acting in good faith! The sensible approach is to stay quiet in public and let the process sort itself out behind the scenes.

Possibly but can it be proved and are we going to admit to that (and he was eager to have his say so clearly there's more to it than black and white.)

Latest : “Hey, Gibbo, let’s sort this, you and me in the car park …. NOW” (Only to spoof for it, not to suggest anything untoward..)

That was then. The country didn't know what sort of Brexit they were getting, and were plainly missoold. Regardless, it's been a load of shite, and needs revisiting.

I’ve said all along Tonda is involved, sadly

Clearly, Boro had cloned Will Salt to stage the whole thing…

Use the just park app, you can get a refund (less booking fee) up to 24hrs before you're due to park. I booked after the semi on Tuesday, 15 mins from Wembley stadium for £30.

No idea how this will work, but won’t the panel make findings or recommendation on whether ‘guilty’ or otherwise ? Any sanctions might then be at the discretion of the EFL as governing body.

How independent is this though ? There must be some off the record discussions about what the EFL want out of this and also possibly some element of plea bargaining from Saints hence Gibson so wound up that he can’t be there

I assume they seek the opinion of the efl though for sanctions which I assume will play some part in the process.

I think the thing with the coffee was that the hotel's CCTV recorded him in the cafeteria and somebody, between the football club and the hotel staff, joined the dots.

You're 100% right there would be no view at all of the single pitch on the right, as the buildings would obscure it. If the first team were using the pitches on the left, then you would have a clear line of sight.

Who, the independent panel sitting in judgement? I imagine the logistics of the final won’t play any part of their decision. They’re independent for a reason, and this is one of the reasons. We would actually been better off with the EFL sitting in judgement imo, I’m sure that would have played a part with them.

Don't be silly. We know it is him.

The context must be relevant to some extent or there wouldn't be much need for a long panel. Unless we are challenging the charge of spying which I haven't seen much indication that we are.

Just had a quick look on the Boro forum, seems they are doing the same here 🤣 For those from Boro reading this, surely we can agree that the Ref (at St Marys) was f-ing shite. You should have had at least 1, possibly 2 penalties, and Saints should have had a least 1 (shirt pull on Stewart). Who knows how the game would have gone had any of them been given. The ref was tragic as he did not have VAR to bail him out. On another note, -6 points is a huge, given Leicester got that for knowingly gained a sporting advantage for well over an entire season (and some), and also did everything they could to fiddle the process in being inspected. As for the sanctions, The EFL have a a range to use, which does leave it to the imagination a bit. Clearly you want us thrown out and Tonda to burn in Hell. We clearly don't want us thrown out and intrigued to know the extent (or not) this took place and who, if anyone, was involved.

Would be the most Saints thing ever that we still play in the final and lose it.

With a chip and pin or contactless the merchant does not have access to your name

No it doesn’t record your name

Has it been confirmed anywhere that the individual, is in fact Will Salt or just someone that’s according to AI Looks like a member of the SFC employees? Also mentioned that he used a card to pay for a coffee, when you pay for something on a card, does it record your name, or just the number details?

Hallelujah

Does there need to be an advantage ? The charge is breaching a regulation re spying on an opponent. Are we guilty of that, yes, or no ? Perhaps some “context” as we phrased it to be taken into account. But it doesn’t seem it’s a two stage test, a)did we do it ? b) what advantage was gained ? The tribunal may reflect on that, but doesn’t seem to me that they need to.

I've none of my own. Which is why I'm outside your window filming you having ideas. 🙂